mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fine-Grained Pillar Feature Encoding Via Spatio-Temporal Virtual Grid for 3D Object Detection

arXiv 2403.06433 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Developing high-performance, real-time architectures for LiDAR-based 3D object detectors is essential for the successful commercialization of autonomous vehicles. Pillar-based methods stand out as a practical choice for onboard deployment due to their computational efficiency. However, despite their efficiency, these methods can sometimes underperform compared to alternative point encoding techniques such as Voxel-encoding or PointNet++. We argue that current pillar-based methods have not sufficiently captured the fine-grained distributions of LiDAR points within each pillar structure. Consequently, there exists considerable room for improvement in pillar feature encoding. In this paper, we introduce a novel pillar encoding architecture referred to as Fine-Grained Pillar Feature Encoding (FG-PFE). FG-PFE utilizes Spatio-Temporal Virtual (STV) grids to capture the distribution of point clouds within each pillar across vertical, temporal, and horizontal dimensions. Through STV grids, points within each pillar are individually encoded using Vertical PFE (V-PFE), Temporal PFE (T-PFE), and Horizontal PFE (H-PFE). These encoded features are then aggregated through an Attentive Pillar Aggregation method. Our experiments conducted on the nuScenes dataset demonstrate that FG-PFE achieves significant performance improvements over baseline models such as PointPillar, CenterPoint-Pillar, and PillarNet, with only a minor increase in computational overhead.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2024.

Builds on

23 of 28 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  2. 2019nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous drivingcited by 4,485
  3. 2017PointNet++: Deep Hierarchical Feature Learning on Point Sets in a Metric Spacecited by 4,384
  4. 2018PointPillars: Fast Encoders for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 1,707
  5. 2017VoxelNet: End-to-End Learning for Point Cloud Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 1,323
  6. 2020Center-based 3D Object Detection and Trackingcited by 1,143
  7. 2018PointRCNN: 3D Object Proposal Generation and Detection from Point Cloudcited by 939
  8. 2019PV-RCNN: Point-Voxel Feature Set Abstraction for 3D Object Detectioncited by 890
  9. 2022TransFusion: Robust LiDAR-Camera Fusion for 3D Object Detection with Transformerscited by 464
  10. 20203DSSD: Point-based 3D Single Stage Object Detectorcited by 440
  11. 2019Class-balanced Grouping and Sampling for Point Cloud 3D Object Detectioncited by 350
  12. 2023VoxelNeXt: Fully Sparse VoxelNet for 3D Object Detection and Trackingcited by 221
11 more
  1. 2022Unifying Voxel-based Representation with Transformer for 3D Object Detectioncited by 202
  2. 2021Embracing Single Stride 3D Object Detector with Sparse Transformercited by 193
  3. 2022Focal Sparse Convolutional Networks for 3D Object Detectioncited by 142
  4. 2023DSVT: Dynamic Sparse Voxel Transformer with Rotated Setscited by 122
  5. 2022PillarNet: Real-Time and High-Performance Pillar-based 3D Object Detectioncited by 99
  6. 2021AFDetV2: Rethinking the Necessity of the Second Stage for Object Detection from Point Cloudscited by 88
  7. 2019Object as Hotspots: An Anchor-Free 3D Object Detection Approach via Firing of Hotspotscited by 84
  8. 2022Fully Sparse 3D Object Detectioncited by 84
  9. 2020HVNet: Hybrid Voxel Network for LiDAR Based 3D Object Detectioncited by 82
  10. 2023PillarNeXt: Rethinking Network Designs for 3D Object Detection in LiDAR Point Cloudscited by 54
  11. 2022VISTA: Boosting 3D Object Detection via Dual Cross-VIew SpaTial Attentioncited by 48

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.