An Improved Analysis of Langevin Algorithms with Prior Diffusion for Non-Log-Concave Sampling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding the dimension dependency of computational complexity in high-dimensional sampling problem is a fundamental problem, both from a practical and theoretical perspective. Compared with samplers with unbiased stationary distribution, e.g., Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm (MALA), biased samplers, e.g., Underdamped Langevin Dynamics (ULD), perform better in low-accuracy cases just because a lower dimension dependency in their complexities. Along this line, Freund et al. (2022) suggest that the modified Langevin algorithm with prior diffusion is able to converge dimension independently for strongly log-concave target distributions. Nonetheless, it remains open whether such property establishes for more general cases. In this paper, we investigate the prior diffusion technique for the target distributions satisfying log-Sobolev inequality (LSI), which covers a much broader class of distributions compared to the strongly log-concave ones. In particular, we prove that the modified Langevin algorithm can also obtain the dimension-independent convergence of KL divergence with different step size schedules. The core of our proof technique is a novel construction of an interpolating SDE, which significantly helps to conduct a more accurate characterization of the discrete updates of the overdamped Langevin dynamics. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates the benefits of prior diffusion for a broader class of target distributions and provides new insights into developing faster sampling algorithms.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Mar 2024.
Builds on
22 of 43 references.
References · 22
- 2017Non-convex learning via Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics: a nonasymptotic analysiscited by 242
- 2019Rapid Convergence of the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm: Isoperimetry Sufficescited by 224
- 2014Theoretical guarantees for approximate sampling from smooth and log-concave densitiescited by 206
- 2016High-dimensional Bayesian inference via the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithmcited by 144
- 2018Analysis of Langevin Monte Carlo via convex optimizationcited by 126
- 2018Sampling as optimization in the space of measures: The Langevin dynamics as a composite optimization problemcited by 123
- 2018Log-concave sampling: Metropolis-Hastings algorithms are fastcited by 117
- 2017User-friendly guarantees for the Langevin Monte Carlo with inaccurate gradientcited by 116
- 2017Global Convergence of Langevin Dynamics Based Algorithms for Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 96
- 2017Convergence of Langevin MCMC in KL-divergencecited by 86
- 2019The Randomized Midpoint Method for Log-Concave Samplingcited by 77
- 2018Sampling Can Be Faster Than Optimizationcited by 68
10 more
- 2014Consistency and fluctuations for stochastic gradient Langevin dynamicscited by 65
- 2019Fast mixing of Metropolized Hamiltonian Monte Carlo: Benefits of multi-step gradientscited by 51
- 2023Faster high-accuracy log-concave sampling via algorithmic warm startscited by 44
- 2023Reverse Diffusion Monte Carlocited by 41
- 2020Faster Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics for Non-Log-Concave Samplingcited by 32
- 2019Proximal Langevin Algorithm: Rapid Convergence Under Isoperimetrycited by 31
- 2013Langevin diffusions and the Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithmcited by 29
- 2019Is There an Analog of Nesterov Acceleration for MCMC?cited by 19
- 2024Faster Sampling without Isoperimetry via Diffusion-based Monte Carlocited by 15
- 2021When is the Convergence Time of Langevin Algorithms Dimension Independent? A Composite Optimization Viewpointcited by 12
Built on by
Not cited yet.