mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Membership Testing in Markov Equivalence Classes via Independence Query Oracles

arXiv 2403.05759 ↗First posted 9 Mar 2024cs.LG cs.AI stat.MEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Understanding causal relationships between variables is a fundamental problem with broad impact in numerous scientific fields. While extensive research has been dedicated to learning causal graphs from data, its complementary concept of testing causal relationships has remained largely unexplored. While learning involves the task of recovering the Markov equivalence class (MEC) of the underlying causal graph from observational data, the testing counterpart addresses the following critical question: Given a specific MEC and observational data from some causal graph, can we determine if the data-generating causal graph belongs to the given MEC? We explore constraint-based testing methods by establishing bounds on the required number of conditional independence tests. Our bounds are in terms of the size of the maximum undirected clique (s) of the given MEC. In the worst case, we show a lower bound of exp(Omega(s)) independence tests. We then give an algorithm that resolves the task with exp(O(s)) tests, matching our lower bound. Compared to the learning problem, where algorithms often use a number of independence tests that is exponential in the maximum in-degree, this shows that testing is relatively easier. In particular, it requires exponentially less independence tests in graphs featuring high in-degrees and small clique sizes. Additionally, using the DAG associahedron, we provide a geometric interpretation of testing versus learning and discuss how our testing result can aid learning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Mar 2024.

Builds on

15 of 71 references.

References · 15

  1. 2013Causal Inference and Causal Explanation with Background Knowledgecited by 168
  2. 2013Causal Inference in the Presence of Latent Variables and Selection Biascited by 165
  3. 2022Greedy Relaxations of the Sparsest Permutation Algorithmcited by 63
  4. 2023Causal Discovery with Language Models as Imperfect Expertscited by 62
  5. 2013Learning Sparse Causal Models is not NP-hardcited by 48
  6. 2023Causal Order: The Key to Leveraging Imperfect Experts in Causal Inferencecited by 46
  7. 2015High-dimensional consistency in score-based and hybrid structure learningcited by 44
  8. 2013Parameter Priors for Directed Acyclic Graphical Models and the Characterization of Several Probability Distributionscited by 41
  9. 2013A Transformational Characterization of Equivalent Bayesian Network Structurescited by 41
  10. 2023Fast Scalable and Accurate Discovery of DAGs Using the Best Order Score Search and Grow-Shrink Treescited by 38
  11. 2013Optimal Algorithms for Testing Closeness of Discrete Distributionscited by 37
  12. 2013On the Logic of Causal Modelscited by 19
3 more
  1. 2020Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Counting and Sampling Markov Equivalent DAGscited by 14
  2. 2023Active causal structure learning with advicecited by 10
  3. 2013SparsityBoost: A New Scoring Function for Learning Bayesian Network Structurecited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.