Generating Hard-Negative Out-of-Scope Data with ChatGPT for Intent Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Intent classifiers must be able to distinguish when a user's utterance does not belong to any supported intent to avoid producing incorrect and unrelated system responses. Although out-of-scope (OOS) detection for intent classifiers has been studied, previous work has not yet studied changes in classifier performance against hard-negative out-of-scope utterances (i.e., inputs that share common features with in-scope data, but are actually out-of-scope). We present an automated technique to generate hard-negative OOS data using ChatGPT. We use our technique to build five new hard-negative OOS datasets, and evaluate each against three benchmark intent classifiers. We show that classifiers struggle to correctly identify hard-negative OOS utterances more than general OOS utterances. Finally, we show that incorporating hard-negative OOS data for training improves model robustness when detecting hard-negative OOS data and general OOS data. Our technique, datasets, and evaluation address an important void in the field, offering a straightforward and inexpensive way to collect hard-negative OOS data and improve intent classifiers' robustness.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2024.
Builds on
32 of 59 references.
References · 32
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
- 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 422
- 2020Efficient Intent Detection with Dual Sentence Encoderscited by 419
- 2020Hard Negative Mixing for Contrastive Learningcited by 399
- 2019An Evaluation Dataset for Intent Classification and Out-of-Scope Predictioncited by 378
- 2018Snips Voice Platform: an embedded Spoken Language Understanding system for private-by-design voice interfacescited by 376
20 more
- 2018Black-box Generation of Adversarial Text Sequences to Evade Deep Learning Classifierscited by 341
- 2020BAE: BERT-based Adversarial Examples for Text Classificationcited by 316
- 2021Exploring the Limits of Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 283
- 2019Benchmarking Natural Language Understanding Services for building Conversational Agentscited by 166
- 2021Optimizing Dense Retrieval Model Training with Hard Negativescited by 154
- 2018Semantic Parsing for Task Oriented Dialog using Hierarchical Representationscited by 101
- 2023Can ChatGPT Reproduce Human-Generated Labels? A Study of Social Computing Taskscited by 88
- 2022Data Augmentation for Intent Classification with Off-the-shelf Large Language Modelscited by 49
- 2023ChatGPT to Replace Crowdsourcing of Paraphrases for Intent Classification: Higher Diversity and Comparable Model Robustnesscited by 41
- 2024If in a Crowdsourced Data Annotation Pipeline, a GPT-4cited by 38
- 2020RADDLE: An Evaluation Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Robust Task-oriented Dialog Systemscited by 36
- 2020Robustness Testing of Language Understanding in Task-Oriented Dialogcited by 32
- 2022LINGUIST: Language Model Instruction Tuning to Generate Annotated Utterances for Intent Classification and Slot Taggingcited by 29
- 2019Outlier Detection for Improved Data Quality and Diversity in Dialog Systemscited by 28
- 2021Are Pretrained Transformers Robust in Intent Classification? A Missing Ingredient in Evaluation of Out-of-Scope Intent Detectioncited by 22
- 2022Evaluating Out-of-Distribution Performance on Document Image Classifierscited by 16
- 2022A Survey of Intent Classification and Slot-Filling Datasets for Task-Oriented Dialogcited by 14
- 2021Quantifying and Avoiding Unfair Qualification Labour in Crowdsourcingcited by 11
- 2021On the Robustness of Intent Classification and Slot Labeling in Goal-oriented Dialog Systems to Real-world Noisecited by 9
- 2022Redwood: Using Collision Detection to Grow a Large-Scale Intent Classification Datasetcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.