mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Generating Hard-Negative Out-of-Scope Data with ChatGPT for Intent Classification

arXiv 2403.05640 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2024cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Intent classifiers must be able to distinguish when a user's utterance does not belong to any supported intent to avoid producing incorrect and unrelated system responses. Although out-of-scope (OOS) detection for intent classifiers has been studied, previous work has not yet studied changes in classifier performance against hard-negative out-of-scope utterances (i.e., inputs that share common features with in-scope data, but are actually out-of-scope). We present an automated technique to generate hard-negative OOS data using ChatGPT. We use our technique to build five new hard-negative OOS datasets, and evaluate each against three benchmark intent classifiers. We show that classifiers struggle to correctly identify hard-negative OOS utterances more than general OOS utterances. Finally, we show that incorporating hard-negative OOS data for training improves model robustness when detecting hard-negative OOS data and general OOS data. Our technique, datasets, and evaluation address an important void in the field, offering a straightforward and inexpensive way to collect hard-negative OOS data and improve intent classifiers' robustness.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2024.

Builds on

32 of 59 references.

References · 32

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  5. 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
  6. 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
  7. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
  8. 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 422
  9. 2020Efficient Intent Detection with Dual Sentence Encoderscited by 419
  10. 2020Hard Negative Mixing for Contrastive Learningcited by 399
  11. 2019An Evaluation Dataset for Intent Classification and Out-of-Scope Predictioncited by 378
  12. 2018Snips Voice Platform: an embedded Spoken Language Understanding system for private-by-design voice interfacescited by 376
20 more
  1. 2018Black-box Generation of Adversarial Text Sequences to Evade Deep Learning Classifierscited by 341
  2. 2020BAE: BERT-based Adversarial Examples for Text Classificationcited by 316
  3. 2021Exploring the Limits of Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 283
  4. 2019Benchmarking Natural Language Understanding Services for building Conversational Agentscited by 166
  5. 2021Optimizing Dense Retrieval Model Training with Hard Negativescited by 154
  6. 2018Semantic Parsing for Task Oriented Dialog using Hierarchical Representationscited by 101
  7. 2023Can ChatGPT Reproduce Human-Generated Labels? A Study of Social Computing Taskscited by 88
  8. 2022Data Augmentation for Intent Classification with Off-the-shelf Large Language Modelscited by 49
  9. 2023ChatGPT to Replace Crowdsourcing of Paraphrases for Intent Classification: Higher Diversity and Comparable Model Robustnesscited by 41
  10. 2024If in a Crowdsourced Data Annotation Pipeline, a GPT-4cited by 38
  11. 2020RADDLE: An Evaluation Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Robust Task-oriented Dialog Systemscited by 36
  12. 2020Robustness Testing of Language Understanding in Task-Oriented Dialogcited by 32
  13. 2022LINGUIST: Language Model Instruction Tuning to Generate Annotated Utterances for Intent Classification and Slot Taggingcited by 29
  14. 2019Outlier Detection for Improved Data Quality and Diversity in Dialog Systemscited by 28
  15. 2021Are Pretrained Transformers Robust in Intent Classification? A Missing Ingredient in Evaluation of Out-of-Scope Intent Detectioncited by 22
  16. 2022Evaluating Out-of-Distribution Performance on Document Image Classifierscited by 16
  17. 2022A Survey of Intent Classification and Slot-Filling Datasets for Task-Oriented Dialogcited by 14
  18. 2021Quantifying and Avoiding Unfair Qualification Labour in Crowdsourcingcited by 11
  19. 2021On the Robustness of Intent Classification and Slot Labeling in Goal-oriented Dialog Systems to Real-world Noisecited by 9
  20. 2022Redwood: Using Collision Detection to Grow a Large-Scale Intent Classification Datasetcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.