mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ConstitutionalExperts: Training a Mixture of Principle-based Prompts

arXiv 2403.04894 ↗First posted 7 Mar 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 7

On the map: Mixture-of-experts → MoE large language models

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) are highly capable at a variety of tasks given the right prompt, but writing one is still a difficult and tedious process. In this work, we introduce ConstitutionalExperts, a method for learning a prompt consisting of constitutional principles (i.e. rules), given a training dataset. Unlike prior methods that optimize the prompt as a single entity, our method incrementally improves the prompt by surgically editing individual principles. We also show that we can improve overall performance by learning unique prompts for different semantic regions of the training data and using a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture to route inputs at inference time. We compare our method to other state of the art prompt-optimization techniques across six benchmark datasets. We also investigate whether MoE improves these other techniques. Our results suggest that ConstitutionalExperts outperforms other prompt optimization techniques by 10.9% (F1) and that mixture-of-experts improves all techniques, suggesting its broad applicability.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in MoE large language models, one of 12 directions in Mixture-of-experts. Builds on 18 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Mar 2024.

Builds on

18 of 28 references.

References · 18

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  4. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
  5. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 2,950
  6. 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
  7. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
  8. 2023Automatic Prompt Optimization with "Gradient Descent" and Beam Searchcited by 628
  9. 2023Promptbreeder: Self-Referential Self-Improvement Via Prompt Evolutioncited by 521
  10. 2021Learning How to Ask: Querying LMs with Mixtures of Soft Promptscited by 376
  11. 2017"Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detectioncited by 361
  12. 2022RLPrompt: Optimizing Discrete Text Prompts with Reinforcement Learningcited by 361
6 more
  1. 2022A Holistic Approach to Undesired Content Detection in the Real Worldcited by 337
  2. 2023Can Generalist Foundation Models Outcompete Special-Purpose Tuning? Case Study in Medicinecited by 319
  3. 2016Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scalecited by 208
  4. 2019Build it Break it Fix it for Dialogue Safety: Robustness from Adversarial Human Attackcited by 176
  5. 2023ConstitutionMaker: Interactively Critiquing Large Language Models by Converting Feedback into Principlescited by 33
  6. 2023Towards Agile Text Classifiers for Everyonecited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

7 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024One Prompt is not Enough: Automated Construction of a Mixture-of-Expert Prompts
  2. 2025PromptCoT 2.0: Scaling Prompt Synthesis for Large Language Model Reasoning
  3. 2025Self-Supervised Prompt Optimization
  4. 2026TATRA: Training-Free Instance-Adaptive Prompting Through Rephrasing and Aggregation
  5. 2026MAC: Multi-Agent Constitution Learning
  6. 2024Multi-expert Prompting Improves Reliability, Safety, and Usefulness of Large Language Models
  7. 2026Small Language Model Helps Resolve Semantic Ambiguity of LLM Prompt
  8. 2024A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models: Techniques and Applications