German also Hallucinates! Inconsistency Detection in News Summaries with the Absinth Dataset
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to remarkable progress on a wide range of natural language processing tasks. Despite the advances, these large-sized models still suffer from hallucinating information in their output, which poses a major issue in automatic text summarization, as we must guarantee that the generated summary is consistent with the content of the source document. Previous research addresses the challenging task of detecting hallucinations in the output (i.e. inconsistency detection) in order to evaluate the faithfulness of the generated summaries. However, these works primarily focus on English and recent multilingual approaches lack German data. This work presents absinth, a manually annotated dataset for hallucination detection in German news summarization and explores the capabilities of novel open-source LLMs on this task in both fine-tuning and in-context learning settings. We open-source and release the absinth dataset to foster further research on hallucination detection in German.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2024.
Builds on
24 of 39 references.
References · 24
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,813
- 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,028
- 2020On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 895
- 2021SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarizationcited by 402
- 2023Orca: Progressive Learning from Complex Explanation Traces of GPT-4cited by 369
- 2021XL-Sum: Large-Scale Multilingual Abstractive Summarization for 44 Languagescited by 346
12 more
- 2018Newsroom: A Dataset of 1.3 Million Summaries with Diverse Extractive Strategiescited by 292
- 2020FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive Summarizationcited by 292
- 2021Annotating and Modeling Fine-grained Factuality in Summarizationcited by 131
- 2022Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Large Language Models Through News Summarizationcited by 90
- 2021The Factual Inconsistency Problem in Abstractive Text Summarization: A Surveycited by 79
- 2023ChatGPT as a Factual Inconsistency Evaluator for Text Summarizationcited by 75
- 2023Can we trust the evaluation on ChatGPT?cited by 63
- 2018A Retrospective Analysis of the Fake News Challenge Stance Detection Taskcited by 49
- 2023Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Multilingual Summarisationcited by 48
- 2022mFACE: Multilingual Summarization with Factual Consistency Evaluationcited by 42
- 2023SEAHORSE: A Multilingual, Multifaceted Dataset for Summarization Evaluationcited by 42
- 2023mLongT5: A Multilingual and Efficient Text-To-Text Transformer for Longer Sequencescited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.