mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exact Enforcement of Temporal Continuity in Sequential Physics-Informed Neural Networks

arXiv 2403.03223 ↗First posted 15 Feb 2024cs.LG physics.comp-phcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The use of deep learning methods in scientific computing represents a potential paradigm shift in engineering problem solving. One of the most prominent developments is Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), in which neural networks are trained to satisfy partial differential equations (PDEs). While this method shows promise, the standard version has been shown to struggle in accurately predicting the dynamic behavior of time-dependent problems. To address this challenge, methods have been proposed that decompose the time domain into multiple segments, employing a distinct neural network in each segment and directly incorporating continuity between them in the loss function of the minimization problem. In this work we introduce a method to exactly enforce continuity between successive time segments via a solution ansatz. This hard constrained sequential PINN (HCS-PINN) method is simple to implement and eliminates the need for any loss terms associated with temporal continuity. The method is tested for a number of benchmark problems involving both linear and non-linear PDEs. Examples include various first order time dependent problems in which traditional PINNs struggle, namely advection, Allen-Cahn, and Korteweg-de Vries equations. Furthermore, second and third order time-dependent problems are demonstrated via wave and Jerky dynamics examples, respectively. Notably, the Jerky dynamics problem is chaotic, making the problem especially sensitive to temporal accuracy. The numerical experiments conducted with the proposed method demonstrated superior convergence and accuracy over both traditional PINNs and the soft-constrained counterparts.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2024.

Builds on

13 of 36 references.

References · 13

  1. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
  2. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
  3. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
  4. 2021Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A reviewcited by 473
  5. 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 335
  6. 2021Physics-informed neural networks with hard constraints for inverse designcited by 280
  7. 2020Self-Adaptive Physics-Informed Neural Networks using a Soft Attention Mechanismcited by 233
  8. 2021Exact imposition of boundary conditions with distance functions in physics-informed deep neural networkscited by 137
  9. 2020A Method for Representing Periodic Functions and Enforcing Exactly Periodic Boundary Conditions with Deep Neural Networkscited by 87
  10. 2021Physics-informed neural networks for solving Reynolds-averaged Navierunicodex2013Stokes equationscited by 68
  11. 2020Physics-Informed Neural Network for Modelling the Thermochemical Curing Process of Composite-Tool Systems During Manufacturecited by 48
  12. 2022Deep Learning Methods for Partial Differential Equations and Related Parameter Identification Problemscited by 34
1 more
  1. 2021Physics-informed neural networks for the shallow-water equations on the spherecited by 32

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

9 papers.