mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Finding Super-spreaders in Network Cascades

arXiv 2403.03205 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2024math.ST cs.IT cs.SIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Suppose that a cascade (e.g., an epidemic) spreads on an unknown graph, and only the infection times of vertices are observed. What can be learned about the graph from the infection times caused by multiple distinct cascades? Most of the literature on this topic focuses on the task of recovering the entire graph, which requires Omega ( log n) cascades for an n-vertex bounded degree graph. Here we ask a different question: can the important parts of the graph be estimated from just a few (i.e., constant number) of cascades, even as n grows large? In this work, we focus on identifying super-spreaders (i.e., high-degree vertices) from infection times caused by a Susceptible-Infected process on a graph. Our first main result shows that vertices of degree greater than n3/4 can indeed be estimated from a constant number of cascades. Our algorithm for doing so leverages a novel connection between vertex degrees and the second derivative of the cumulative infection curve. Conversely, we show that estimating vertices of degree smaller than n1/2 requires at least log(n) / log log (n) cascades. Surprisingly, this matches (up to log log n factors) the number of cascades needed to learn the entire graph if it is a tree.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.