mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Explicitly Conditioned Sparsifying Transforms

arXiv 2403.03168 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2024math.NA cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sparsifying transforms became in the last decades widely known tools for finding structured sparse representations of signals in certain transform domains. Despite the popularity of classical transforms such as DCT and Wavelet, learning optimal transforms that guarantee good representations of data into the sparse domain has been recently analyzed in a series of papers. Typically, the conditioning number and representation ability are complementary key features of learning square transforms that may not be explicitly controlled in a given optimization model. Unlike the existing approaches from the literature, in our paper, we consider a new sparsifying transform model that enforces explicit control over the data representation quality and the condition number of the learned transforms. We confirm through numerical experiments that our model presents better numerical behavior than the state-of-the-art.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2024.

Builds on

3 of 22 references.

References · 3

  1. 2015ℓ0 Sparsifying Transform Learning with Efficient Optimal Updates and Convergence Guaranteescited by 6
  2. 2022Learning Sparsity-Promoting Regularizers using Bilevel Optimizationcited by 4
  3. 2023Solving constrained Procrustes problems: a conic optimization approachcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.