OffensiveLang: A Community Based Implicit Offensive Language Dataset
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The widespread presence of hateful languages on social media has resulted in adverse effects on societal well-being. As a result, addressing this issue with high priority has become very important. Hate speech or offensive languages exist in both explicit and implicit forms, with the latter being more challenging to detect. Current research in this domain encounters several challenges. Firstly, the existing datasets primarily rely on the collection of texts containing explicit offensive keywords, making it challenging to capture implicitly offensive contents that are devoid of these keywords. Secondly, common methodologies tend to focus solely on textual analysis, neglecting the valuable insights that community information can provide. In this research paper, we introduce a novel dataset OffensiveLang, a community based implicit offensive language dataset generated by ChatGPT 3.5 containing data for 38 different target groups. Despite limitations in generating offensive texts using ChatGPT due to ethical constraints, we present a prompt-based approach that effectively generates implicit offensive languages. To ensure data quality, we evaluate the dataset with human. Additionally, we employ a prompt-based zero-shot method with ChatGPT and compare the detection results between human annotation and ChatGPT annotation. We utilize existing state-of-the-art models to see how effective they are in detecting such languages. The dataset is available here: https://github.com/AmitDasRup123/OffensiveLang
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2024.
Builds on
24 of 43 references.
References · 24
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
- 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,255
- 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 934
- 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 724
- 2023Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learningcited by 705
- 2020It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learnerscited by 668
- 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 403
- 2019Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social Mediacited by 268
- 2021Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate Speechcited by 216
12 more
- 2019SemEval-2019 Task 6: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media (OffensEval)cited by 206
- 2019Commonsense Knowledge Mining from Pretrained Modelscited by 189
- 2023Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speechcited by 165
- 2019oLMpics -- On what Language Model Pre-training Capturescited by 161
- 2023Can ChatGPT Reproduce Human-Generated Labels? A Study of Social Computing Taskscited by 88
- 2021Detecting Hate Speech with GPT-3cited by 55
- 2023"HOT" ChatGPT: The promise of ChatGPT in detecting and discriminating hateful, offensive, and toxic comments on social mediacited by 45
- 2023GPT-Sentinel: Distinguishing Human and ChatGPT Generated Contentcited by 40
- 2017The Effect of Different Writing Tasks on Linguistic Style: A Case Study of the ROC Story Cloze Taskcited by 39
- 2023CHEAT: A Large-scale Dataset for Detecting ChatGPT-writtEn AbsTractscited by 39
- 2023You Only Prompt Once: On the Capabilities of Prompt Learning on Large Language Models to Tackle Toxic Contentcited by 37
- 2018Leveraging Intra-User and Inter-User Representation Learning for Automated Hate Speech Detectioncited by 25
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.