mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Decade of Privacy-Relevant Android App Reviews: Large Scale Trends

arXiv 2403.02292 ↗First posted 4 Mar 2024cs.LG cs.HCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present an analysis of 12 million instances of privacy-relevant reviews publicly visible on the Google Play Store that span a 10 year period. By leveraging state of the art NLP techniques, we examine what users have been writing about privacy along multiple dimensions: time, countries, app types, diverse privacy topics, and even across a spectrum of emotions. We find consistent growth of privacy-relevant reviews, and explore topics that are trending (such as Data Deletion and Data Theft), as well as those on the decline (such as privacy-relevant reviews on sensitive permissions). We find that although privacy reviews come from more than 200 countries, 33 countries provide 90% of privacy reviews. We conduct a comparison across countries by examining the distribution of privacy topics a country's users write about, and find that geographic proximity is not a reliable indicator that nearby countries have similar privacy perspectives. We uncover some countries with unique patterns and explore those herein. Surprisingly, we uncover that it is not uncommon for reviews that discuss privacy to be positive (32%); many users express pleasure about privacy features within apps or privacy-focused apps. We also uncover some unexpected behaviors, such as the use of reviews to deliver privacy disclaimers to developers. Finally, we demonstrate the value of analyzing app reviews with our approach as a complement to existing methods for understanding users' perspectives about privacy

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 100 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Mar 2024.

Builds on

20 of 100 references.

References · 20

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  4. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  5. 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,219
  6. 2020GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained Emotionscited by 479
  7. 2021Sentence-T5: Scalable Sentence Encoders from Pre-trained Text-to-Text Modelscited by 462
  8. 2022Building Machine Translation Systems for the Next Thousand Languagescited by 69
  9. 2015Android Permissions Remystified: A Field Study on Contextual Integritycited by 15
  10. 2023Ethical Frameworks and Computer Security Trolley Problems: Foundations for Conversationscited by 10
  11. 2019Evaluating the Information Security Awareness of Smartphone Userscited by 3
  12. 2021SoK: A Framework for Unifying At-Risk User Researchcited by 3
8 more
  1. 2022A World Full of Privacy and Security (Mis)conceptions? Findings of a Representative Survey in 12 Countriescited by 3
  2. 2019An Analysis of Pre-installed Android Softwarecited by 2
  3. 2020Why Older Adults (Don't) Use Password Managerscited by 2
  4. 2018The Android Update Problem: An Empirical Studycited by 1
  5. 2018"Should I Worry?" A Cross-Cultural Examination of Account Security Incident Responsecited by 1
  6. 2022"All of them claim to be the best": Multi-perspective study of VPN users and VPN providerscited by 1
  7. 2022"If sighted people know, I should be able to know:" Privacy Perceptions of Bystanders with Visual Impairments around Camera-based Technologycited by 1
  8. 2023How WEIRD is Usable Privacy and Security Research? (Extended Version)cited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.