Position: Insights from Survey Methodology can Improve Training Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Whether future AI models are fair, trustworthy, and aligned with the public's interests rests in part on our ability to collect accurate data about what we want the models to do. However, collecting high-quality data is difficult, and few AI/ML researchers are trained in data collection methods. Recent research in data-centric AI has show that higher quality training data leads to better performing models, making this the right moment to introduce AI/ML researchers to the field of survey methodology, the science of data collection. We summarize insights from the survey methodology literature and discuss how they can improve the quality of training and feedback data. We also suggest collaborative research ideas into how biases in data collection can be mitigated, making models more accurate and human-centric.
Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 7; 2026: 4.
13 papers.
Sort:
- 2025LLM Generated Persona is a Promise with a Catchcited by 77
- 2024The Potential and Challenges of Evaluating Attitudes, Opinions, and Values in Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2024Mitigating Selection Bias with Node Pruning and Auxiliary Optionscited by 12
- 2025SATA-BENCH: Select All That Apply Benchmark for Multiple Choice Questionscited by 9
- 2025HESEIA: A community-based dataset for evaluating social biases in large language models, co-designed in real school settings in Latin Americacited by 6
- 2025Bias in the Loop: How Humans Evaluate AI-Generated Suggestionscited by 4
- 2025From Noise to Signal to Selbstzweck: Reframing Human Label Variation in the Era of Post-training in NLPcited by 3
- 2026From Ground Truth to Measurement: A Statistical Framework for Human Labelingcited by 2
- 2025Aligning NLP Models with Target Population Perspectives using PAIR: Population-Aligned Instance Replicationcited by 1
- 2025Too Open for Opinion? Embracing Open-Endedness in Large Language Models for Social Simulationcited by 1
- 2026Shared SFT Lessons Across Alignment, Model Organisms, and Toy Modelscited by 1
- 2026An Assessment of Human vs. Model Uncertainty in Soft-Label Learning and Calibrationcited by 0
1 more
- 2026Reliable but Design-Sensitive: Instrument Uncertainty in LLM Annotation22 Sep 2026
- 2026Shared SFT Lessons Across Alignment, Model Organisms, and Toy Models28 Jul 2026
- 2026An Assessment of Human vs. Model Uncertainty in Soft-Label Learning and Calibration18 May 2026
- 2026From Ground Truth to Measurement: A Statistical Framework for Human Labeling8 Apr 2026
- 2025Too Open for Opinion? Embracing Open-Endedness in Large Language Models for Social Simulation14 Oct 2025
- 2025From Noise to Signal to Selbstzweck: Reframing Human Label Variation in the Era of Post-training in NLP9 Oct 2025
- 2025Bias in the Loop: How Humans Evaluate AI-Generated Suggestions10 Sep 2025
- 2025SATA-BENCH: Select All That Apply Benchmark for Multiple Choice Questions31 May 2025
- 2025HESEIA: A community-based dataset for evaluating social biases in large language models, co-designed in real school settings in Latin America30 May 2025
- 2025LLM Generated Persona is a Promise with a Catch18 Mar 2025
- 2025Aligning NLP Models with Target Population Perspectives using PAIR: Population-Aligned Instance Replication12 Jan 2025
- 2024Mitigating Selection Bias with Node Pruning and Auxiliary Options27 Sep 2024
- 2025LLM Generated Persona is a Promise with a Catchcited by 77
- 2024The Potential and Challenges of Evaluating Attitudes, Opinions, and Values in Large Language Modelscited by 19
- 2024Mitigating Selection Bias with Node Pruning and Auxiliary Optionscited by 12
- 2025SATA-BENCH: Select All That Apply Benchmark for Multiple Choice Questionscited by 9
- 2025HESEIA: A community-based dataset for evaluating social biases in large language models, co-designed in real school settings in Latin Americacited by 6
- 2025Bias in the Loop: How Humans Evaluate AI-Generated Suggestionscited by 4
- 2025From Noise to Signal to Selbstzweck: Reframing Human Label Variation in the Era of Post-training in NLPcited by 3
- 2026From Ground Truth to Measurement: A Statistical Framework for Human Labelingcited by 2
- 2025Aligning NLP Models with Target Population Perspectives using PAIR: Population-Aligned Instance Replicationcited by 1
- 2025Too Open for Opinion? Embracing Open-Endedness in Large Language Models for Social Simulationcited by 1
- 2026Shared SFT Lessons Across Alignment, Model Organisms, and Toy Modelscited by 1
- 2026An Assessment of Human vs. Model Uncertainty in Soft-Label Learning and Calibrationcited by 0
12 most cited of 13 All 13 (JSON)
- 2026Reliable but Design-Sensitive: Instrument Uncertainty in LLM Annotation22 Sep 2026
- 2026Shared SFT Lessons Across Alignment, Model Organisms, and Toy Models28 Jul 2026
- 2026An Assessment of Human vs. Model Uncertainty in Soft-Label Learning and Calibration18 May 2026
- 2026From Ground Truth to Measurement: A Statistical Framework for Human Labeling8 Apr 2026
- 2025Too Open for Opinion? Embracing Open-Endedness in Large Language Models for Social Simulation14 Oct 2025
- 2025From Noise to Signal to Selbstzweck: Reframing Human Label Variation in the Era of Post-training in NLP9 Oct 2025
- 2025Bias in the Loop: How Humans Evaluate AI-Generated Suggestions10 Sep 2025
- 2025SATA-BENCH: Select All That Apply Benchmark for Multiple Choice Questions31 May 2025
- 2025HESEIA: A community-based dataset for evaluating social biases in large language models, co-designed in real school settings in Latin America30 May 2025
- 2025LLM Generated Persona is a Promise with a Catch18 Mar 2025
- 2025Aligning NLP Models with Target Population Perspectives using PAIR: Population-Aligned Instance Replication12 Jan 2025
- 2024Mitigating Selection Bias with Node Pruning and Auxiliary Options27 Sep 2024
12 newest of 13 All 13 (JSON)