Zero-Shot Topic Classification of Column Headers: Leveraging LLMs for Metadata Enrichment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Traditional dataset retrieval systems rely on metadata for indexing, rather than on the underlying data values. However, high-quality metadata creation and enrichment often require manual annotations, which is a labour-intensive and challenging process to automate. In this study, we propose a method to support metadata enrichment using topic annotations generated by three Large Language Models (LLMs): ChatGPT-3.5, GoogleBard, and GoogleGemini. Our analysis focuses on classifying column headers based on domain-specific topics from the Consortium of European Social Science Data Archives (CESSDA), a Linked Data controlled vocabulary. Our approach operates in a zero-shot setting, integrating the controlled topic vocabulary directly within the input prompt. This integration serves as a Large Context Windows approach, with the aim of improving the results of the topic classification task. We evaluated the performance of the LLMs in terms of internal consistency, inter-machine alignment, and agreement with human classification. Additionally, we investigate the impact of contextual information (i.e., dataset description) on the classification outcomes. Our findings suggest that ChatGPT and GoogleGemini outperform GoogleBard in terms of internal consistency as well as LLM-human-agreement. Interestingly, we found that contextual information had no significant impact on LLM performance. This work proposes a novel approach that leverages LLMs for topic classification of column headers using a controlled vocabulary, presenting a practical application of LLMs and Large Context Windows within the Semantic Web domain. This approach has the potential to facilitate automated metadata enrichment, thereby enhancing dataset retrieval and the Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability (FAIR) of research data on the Web.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Mar 2024.
Builds on
23 of 48 references.
References · 23
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
- 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,126
- 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
- 2021Improving language models by retrieving from trillions of tokenscited by 1,278
- 2020Leveraging Passage Retrieval with Generative Models for Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 1,203
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 849
- 2023Active Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 506
- 2023Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedbackcited by 351
- 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 307
- 2023ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of nonecited by 204
11 more
- 2020The Next Decade in AI: Four Steps Towards Robust Artificial Intelligencecited by 194
- 2022Large Language Models with Controllable Working Memorycited by 169
- 2021The Curious Case of Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translationcited by 161
- 2022DocPrompting: Generating Code by Retrieving the Docscited by 151
- 2022Rethinking with Retrieval: Faithful Large Language Model Inferencecited by 145
- 2020Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization Modelscited by 108
- 2023Are ChatGPT and GPT-4 General-Purpose Solvers for Financial Text Analytics? A Study on Several Typical Taskscited by 59
- 2023In ChatGPT We Trust? Measuring and Characterizing the Reliability of ChatGPTcited by 35
- 2023ChatGraph: Interpretable Text Classification by Converting ChatGPT Knowledge to Graphscited by 27
- 2024ChatGPT vs Gemini vs LLaMA on Multilingual Sentiment Analysiscited by 13
- 2021The I-ADOPT Interoperability Framework for FAIRer data descriptions of biodiversitycited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2026A Survey on Evaluating Quality and Trustworthiness in LLM-Generated Datacited by 5
- 2025ACT as Human: Multimodal Large Language Model Data Annotation with Critical Thinkingcited by 3
- 2025SEOE: A Scalable and Reliable Semantic Evaluation Framework for Open Domain Event Detectioncited by 2
- 2024Column Vocabulary Association (CVA): semantic interpretation of dataless tablescited by 0
- 2026Characterising AI Models for Cataloguingcited by 0
- 2026Characterising AI Models for Cataloguing13 Jul 2026
- 2026A Survey on Evaluating Quality and Trustworthiness in LLM-Generated Data25 Jan 2026
- 2025ACT as Human: Multimodal Large Language Model Data Annotation with Critical Thinking13 Nov 2025
- 2025SEOE: A Scalable and Reliable Semantic Evaluation Framework for Open Domain Event Detection5 Mar 2025
- 2024Column Vocabulary Association (CVA): semantic interpretation of dataless tables6 Sep 2024