mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Leveraging AI Predicted and Expert Revised Annotations in Interactive Segmentation: Continual Tuning or Full Training?

arXiv 2402.19423 ↗First posted 29 Feb 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Interactive segmentation, an integration of AI algorithms and human expertise, premises to improve the accuracy and efficiency of curating large-scale, detailed-annotated datasets in healthcare. Human experts revise the annotations predicted by AI, and in turn, AI improves its predictions by learning from these revised annotations. This interactive process continues to enhance the quality of annotations until no major revision is needed from experts. The key challenge is how to leverage AI predicted and expert revised annotations to iteratively improve the AI. Two problems arise: (1) The risk of catastrophic forgetting--the AI tends to forget the previously learned classes if it is only retrained using the expert revised classes. (2) Computational inefficiency when retraining the AI using both AI predicted and expert revised annotations; moreover, given the dominant AI predicted annotations in the dataset, the contribution of newly revised annotations--often account for a very small fraction--to the AI training remains marginal. This paper proposes Continual Tuning to address the problems from two perspectives: network design and data reuse. Firstly, we design a shared network for all classes followed by class-specific networks dedicated to individual classes. To mitigate forgetting, we freeze the shared network for previously learned classes and only update the class-specific network for revised classes. Secondly, we reuse a small fraction of data with previous annotations to avoid over-computing. The selection of such data relies on the importance estimate of each data. The importance score is computed by combining the uncertainty and consistency of AI predictions. Our experiments demonstrate that Continual Tuning achieves a speed 16x greater than repeatedly training AI from scratch without compromising the performance.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Feb 2024.

Builds on

11 of 25 references.

References · 11

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  3. 2017Accurate, Large Minibatch SGD: Training ImageNet in 1 Hourcited by 1,479
  4. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
  5. 2021Self-Supervised Pre-Training of Swin Transformers for 3D Medical Image Analysiscited by 418
  6. 2023CLIP-Driven Universal Model for Organ Segmentation and Tumor Detectioncited by 224
  7. 2020AbdomenCT-1K: Is Abdominal Organ Segmentation A Solved Problem?cited by 222
  8. 2020Adaptive Aggregation Networks for Class-Incremental Learningcited by 149
  9. 2023Continual Learning for Abdominal Multi-Organ and Tumor Segmentationcited by 43
  10. 2022Making Your First Choice: To Address Cold Start Problem in Vision Active Learningcited by 25
  11. 2022Learning Incrementally to Segment Multiple Organs in a CT Imagecited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

9 papers.