Robust Synthetic Data-Driven Detection of Living-Off-the-Land Reverse Shells
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Living-off-the-land (LOTL) techniques pose a significant challenge to security operations, exploiting legitimate tools to execute malicious commands that evade traditional detection methods. To address this, we present a robust augmentation framework for cyber defense systems as Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions, enabling the detection of LOTL attacks such as reverse shells through machine learning. Leveraging real-world threat intelligence and adversarial training, our framework synthesizes diverse malicious datasets while preserving the variability of legitimate activity, ensuring high accuracy and low false-positive rates. We validate our approach through extensive experiments on enterprise-scale datasets, achieving a 90% improvement in detection rates over non-augmented baselines at an industry-grade False Positive Rate (FPR) of 10-5. We define black-box data-driven attacks that successfully evade unprotected models, and develop defenses to mitigate them, producing adversarially robust variants of ML models. Ethical considerations are central to this work; we discuss safeguards for synthetic data generation and the responsible release of pre-trained models across four best performing architectures, including both adversarially and regularly trained variants: https://huggingface.co/dtrizna/quasarnix. Furthermore, we provide a malicious LOTL dataset containing over 1 million augmented attack variants to enable reproducible research and community collaboration: https://huggingface.co/datasets/dtrizna/QuasarNix. This work offers a reproducible, scalable, and production-ready defense against evolving LOTL threats.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2024.
Builds on
18 of 44 references.
References · 18
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
- 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
- 2022Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated datacited by 187
- 2016DeepCoder: Learning to Write Programscited by 145
- 2018NL2Bash: A Corpus and Semantic Parser for Natural Language Interface to the Linux Operating Systemcited by 97
6 more
- 2022Wild Patterns Reloaded: A Survey of Machine Learning Security against Training Data Poisoningcited by 93
- 2022The Role of Machine Learning in Cybersecuritycited by 21
- 2019Neurlux: Dynamic Malware Analysis Without Feature Engineeringcited by 12
- 2021Living-Off-The-Land Command Detection Using Active Learningcited by 8
- 2023Nebula: Self-Attention for Dynamic Malware Analysiscited by 7
- 2021Shell Language Processing: Unix command parsing for Machine Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.