Enhancing Tracking Robustness with Auxiliary Adversarial Defense Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Adversarial attacks in visual object tracking have significantly degraded the performance of advanced trackers by introducing imperceptible perturbations into images. However, there is still a lack of research on designing adversarial defense methods for object tracking. To address these issues, we propose an effective auxiliary pre-processing defense network, AADN, which performs defensive transformations on the input images before feeding them into the tracker. Moreover, it can be seamlessly integrated with other visual trackers as a plug-and-play module without parameter adjustments. We train AADN using adversarial training, specifically employing Dua-Loss to generate adversarial samples that simultaneously attack the classification and regression branches of the tracker. Extensive experiments conducted on the OTB100, LaSOT, and VOT2018 benchmarks demonstrate that AADN maintains excellent defense robustness against adversarial attack methods in both adaptive and non-adaptive attack scenarios. Moreover, when transferring the defense network to heterogeneous trackers, it exhibits reliable transferability. Finally, AADN achieves a processing time of up to 5ms/frame, allowing seamless integration with existing high-speed trackers without introducing significant computational overhead.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Feb 2024.
Builds on
26 of 42 references.
References · 26
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
- 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
- 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
- 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 547
14 more
- 2017Adversarial Examples Are Not Easily Detected: Bypassing Ten Detection Methodscited by 542
- 2018SiamRPN++: Evolution of Siamese Visual Tracking with Very Deep Networkscited by 445
- 2018LaSOT: A High-quality Benchmark for Large-scale Single Object Trackingcited by 424
- 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 276
- 2018Fast Online Object Tracking and Segmentation: A Unifying Approachcited by 272
- 2020Ocean: Object-aware Anchor-free Trackingcited by 212
- 2020Efficient Adversarial Attacks for Visual Object Trackingcited by 66
- 2021Exploring Simple 3D Multi-Object Tracking for Autonomous Drivingcited by 56
- 2020Cooling-Shrinking Attack: Blinding the Tracker with Imperceptible Noisescited by 32
- 2022Time3D: End-to-End Joint Monocular 3D Object Detection and Tracking for Autonomous Drivingcited by 30
- 2021IoU Attack: Towards Temporally Coherent Black-Box Adversarial Attack for Visual Object Trackingcited by 25
- 2022Efficient universal shuffle attack for visual object trackingcited by 14
- 2018Adversarial Defense based on Structure-to-Signal Autoencoderscited by 10
- 2021A Simple and Strong Baseline for Universal Targeted Attacks on Siamese Visual Trackingcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.