Linguistic Knowledge Can Enhance Encoder-Decoder Models (If You Let It)
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we explore the impact of augmenting pre-trained Encoder-Decoder models, specifically T5, with linguistic knowledge for the prediction of a target task. In particular, we investigate whether fine-tuning a T5 model on an intermediate task that predicts structural linguistic properties of sentences modifies its performance in the target task of predicting sentence-level complexity. Our study encompasses diverse experiments conducted on Italian and English datasets, employing both monolingual and multilingual T5 models at various sizes. Results obtained for both languages and in cross-lingual configurations show that linguistically motivated intermediate fine-tuning has generally a positive impact on target task performance, especially when applied to smaller models and in scenarios with limited data availability.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2024.
Builds on
25 of 46 references.
References · 25
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
- 2020mT5: A massively multilingual pre-trained text-to-text transformercited by 1,813
- 2018Analysis Methods in Neural Language Processing: A Surveycited by 276
- 2022Can language models learn from explanations in context?cited by 248
- 2018Sentence Encoders on STILTs: Supplementary Training on Intermediate Labeled-data Taskscited by 214
- 2020Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structurecited by 204
13 more
- 2020Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?cited by 144
- 2020Intermediate-Task Transfer Learning with Pretrained Models for Natural Language Understanding: When and Why Does It Work?cited by 127
- 2020Exploring and Predicting Transferability across NLP Taskscited by 126
- 2019StructBERT: Incorporating Language Structures into Pre-training for Deep Language Understandingcited by 108
- 2021Syntax-BERT: Improving Pre-trained Transformers with Syntax Treescited by 51
- 2020Is Supervised Syntactic Parsing Beneficial for Language Understanding? An Empirical Investigationcited by 34
- 2020Linguistic Profiling of a Neural Language Modelcited by 23
- 2022IT5: Text-to-text Pretraining for Italian Language Understanding and Generationcited by 20
- 2021Rethinking Why Intermediate-Task Fine-Tuning Workscited by 18
- 2022Exploring the Role of Task Transferability in Large-Scale Multi-Task Learningcited by 17
- 2022When to Use Multi-Task Learning vs Intermediate Fine-Tuning for Pre-Trained Encoder Transfer Learningcited by 17
- 2022Probing via Promptingcited by 7
- 2021Does QA-based intermediate training help fine-tuning language models for text classification?cited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.