RAGFormer: Learning Semantic Attributes and Topological Structure for Fraud Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fraud detection remains a challenging task due to the complex and deceptive nature of fraudulent activities. Current approaches primarily concentrate on learning only one perspective of the graph: either the topological structure of the graph or the attributes of individual nodes. However, we conduct empirical studies to reveal that these two types of features, while nearly orthogonal, are each independently effective. As a result, previous methods can not fully capture the comprehensive characteristics of the fraud graph. To address this dilemma, we present a novel framework called Relation-Aware GNN with transFormer~(RAGFormer) which simultaneously embeds both semantic and topological features into a target node. The simple yet effective network consists of a semantic encoder, a topology encoder, and an attention fusion module. The semantic encoder utilizes Transformer to learn semantic features and node interactions across different relations. We introduce Relation-Aware GNN as the topology encoder to learn topological features and node interactions within each relation. These two complementary features are interleaved through an attention fusion module to support prediction by both orthogonal features. Extensive experiments on two popular public datasets demonstrate that RAGFormer achieves state-of-the-art performance. The significant improvement of RAGFormer in an industrial credit card fraud detection dataset further validates the applicability of our method in real-world business scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Feb 2024.
Builds on
20 of 43 references.
References · 20
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,016
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,684
- 2019Heterogeneous Graph Attention Networkcited by 732
- 2019GraphSAINT: Graph Sampling Based Inductive Learning Methodcited by 618
- 2020Enhancing Graph Neural Network-based Fraud Detectors against Camouflaged Fraudsterscited by 248
8 more
- 2019Deep Graph Library: A Graph-Centric, Highly-Performant Package for Graph Neural Networkscited by 241
- 2020A Semi-supervised Graph Attentive Network for Financial Fraud Detectioncited by 150
- 2013From Amateurs to Connoisseurs: Modeling the Evolution of User Expertise through Online Reviewscited by 107
- 2020Heterogeneous Graph Neural Networks for Malicious Account Detectioncited by 95
- 2020Alleviating the Inconsistency Problem of Applying Graph Neural Network to Fraud Detectioncited by 81
- 2021Anomaly Detection in Dynamic Graphs via Transformercited by 57
- 2021Reinforced Neighborhood Selection Guided Multi-Relational Graph Neural Networkscited by 38
- 2023Label Information Enhanced Fraud Detection against Low Homophily in Graphscited by 22
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.