mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding the Dataset Practitioners Behind Large Language Model Development

arXiv 2402.16611 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.HCcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As large language models (LLMs) become more advanced and impactful, it is increasingly important to scrutinize the data that they rely upon and produce. What is it to be a dataset practitioner doing this work? We approach this in two parts: first, we define the role of "dataset practitioners" by performing a retrospective analysis on the responsibilities of teams contributing to LLM development at a technology company, Google. Then, we conduct semi-structured interviews with a cross-section of these practitioners (N=10). We find that although data quality is a top priority, there is little consensus around what data quality is and how to evaluate it. Consequently, practitioners either rely on their own intuition or write custom code to evaluate their data. We discuss potential reasons for this phenomenon and opportunities for alignment.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2024.

Builds on

22 of 58 references.

References · 22

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  4. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  5. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  6. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  7. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
  8. 2018Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 508
  9. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  10. 2020Opportunities and Challenges in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Surveycited by 252
  11. 2019The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Modelscited by 207
  12. 2020A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processingcited by 206
10 more
  1. 2023A Pretrainer's Guide to Training Data: Measuring the Effects of Data Age, Domain Coverage, Quality, & Toxicitycited by 180
  2. 2020The Language Interpretability Tool: Extensible, Interactive Visualizations and Analysis for NLP Modelscited by 125
  3. 2018Visual Analytics in Deep Learning: An Interrogative Survey for the Next Frontierscited by 117
  4. 2023ChainForge: A Visual Toolkit for Prompt Engineering and LLM Hypothesis Testingcited by 88
  5. 2019Human-AI Collaboration in Data Science: Exploring Data Scientists' Perceptions of Automated AIcited by 79
  6. 2020How do Data Science Workers Collaborate? Roles, Workflows, and Toolscited by 64
  7. 2018RuleMatrix: Visualizing and Understanding Classifiers with Rulescited by 62
  8. 2021Collaboration Challenges in Building ML-Enabled Systems: Communication, Documentation, Engineering, and Processcited by 56
  9. 2017The Promise and Peril of Human Evaluation for Model Interpretabilitycited by 52
  10. 2018The Future of Spreadsheets in the Big Data Eracited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.