Information-Theoretic Safe Bayesian Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider a sequential decision making task, where the goal is to optimize an unknown function without evaluating parameters that violate an a~priori unknown (safety) constraint. A common approach is to place a Gaussian process prior on the unknown functions and allow evaluations only in regions that are safe with high probability. Most current methods rely on a discretization of the domain and cannot be directly extended to the continuous case. Moreover, the way in which they exploit regularity assumptions about the constraint introduces an additional critical hyperparameter. In this paper, we propose an information-theoretic safe exploration criterion that directly exploits the GP posterior to identify the most informative safe parameters to evaluate. The combination of this exploration criterion with a well known Bayesian optimization acquisition function yields a novel safe Bayesian optimization selection criterion. Our approach is naturally applicable to continuous domains and does not require additional explicit hyperparameters. We theoretically analyze the method and show that we do not violate the safety constraint with high probability and that we learn about the value of the safe optimum up to arbitrary precision. Empirical evaluations demonstrate improved data-efficiency and scalability.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2024.
Builds on
23 of 46 references.
References · 23
- 2017On Kernelized Multi-armed Banditscited by 348
- 2019Challenges of Real-World Reinforcement Learningcited by 282
- 2017Max-value Entropy Search for Efficient Bayesian Optimizationcited by 202
- 2014Predictive Entropy Search for Efficient Global Optimization of Black-box Functionscited by 201
- 2016Bayesian Optimization with Safety Constraints: Safe and Automatic Parameter Tuning in Roboticscited by 134
- 2014Bayesian Optimization with Unknown Constraintscited by 109
- 2018Stagewise Safe Bayesian Optimization with Gaussian Processescited by 79
- 2015Safe Controller Optimization for Quadrotors with Gaussian Processescited by 77
- 2019Adaptive and Safe Bayesian Optimization in High Dimensions via One-Dimensional Subspacescited by 73
- 2016Safe Exploration in Finite Markov Decision Processes with Gaussian Processescited by 72
- 2022Joint Entropy Search for Maximally-Informed Bayesian Optimizationcited by 55
- 2019Safe Exploration for Interactive Machine Learningcited by 51
11 more
- 2021Practical and Rigorous Uncertainty Bounds for Gaussian Process Regressioncited by 49
- 2020Efficient Nonmyopic Bayesian Optimization via One-Shot Multi-Step Treescited by 41
- 2015GLASSES: Relieving The Myopia Of Bayesian Optimisationcited by 38
- 2020Noisy-Input Entropy Search for Efficient Robust Bayesian Optimizationcited by 24
- 2019Why Non-myopic Bayesian Optimization is Promising and How Far Should We Look-ahead? A Study via Rolloutcited by 23
- 2019Constrained Bayesian Optimization with Max-Value Entropy Searchcited by 20
- 2022Safe Active Learning for Multi-Output Gaussian Processescited by 13
- 2013Gaussian Process Optimization with Mutual Informationcited by 11
- 2022Near-Optimal Multi-Agent Learning for Safe Coverage Controlcited by 11
- 2022Information-Theoretic Safe Exploration with Gaussian Processescited by 9
- 2020Blue River Controls: A toolkit for Reinforcement Learning Control Systems on Hardwarecited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.