On Evaluation Protocols for Data Augmentation in a Limited Data Scenario
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Textual data augmentation (DA) is a prolific field of study where novel techniques to create artificial data are regularly proposed, and that has demonstrated great efficiency on small data settings, at least for text classification tasks. In this paper, we challenge those results, showing that classical data augmentation (which modify sentences) is simply a way of performing better fine-tuning, and that spending more time doing so before applying data augmentation negates its effect. This is a significant contribution as it answers several questions that were left open in recent years, namely~: which DA technique performs best (all of them as long as they generate data close enough to the training set, as to not impair training) and why did DA show positive results (facilitates training of network). We further show that zero- and few-shot DA via conversational agents such as ChatGPT or LLama2 can increase performances, confirming that this form of data augmentation is preferable to classical methods.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Feb 2024.
Builds on
27 of 51 references.
References · 27
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2019EDA: Easy Data Augmentation Techniques for Boosting Performance on Text Classification Taskscited by 800
- 2021A Survey of Data Augmentation Approaches for NLPcited by 408
- 2018Snips Voice Platform: an embedded Spoken Language Understanding system for private-by-design voice interfacescited by 376
- 2018Contextual Augmentation: Data Augmentation by Words with Paradigmatic Relationscited by 201
- 2021GPT3Mix: Leveraging Large-scale Language Models for Text Augmentationcited by 185
- 2018QANet: Combining Local Convolution with Global Self-Attention for Reading Comprehensioncited by 164
- 2018Conditional BERT Contextual Augmentationcited by 107
- 2021An Empirical Survey of Data Augmentation for Limited Data Learning in NLPcited by 101
15 more
- 2021AEDA: An Easier Data Augmentation Technique for Text Classificationcited by 67
- 2020Data Boost: Text Data Augmentation Through Reinforcement Learning Guided Conditional Generationcited by 47
- 2023Radiology-Llama2: Best-in-Class Large Language Model for Radiologycited by 42
- 2018Text Data Augmentation Made Simple By Leveraging NLP Cloud APIscited by 40
- 2019Improving short text classification through global augmentation methodscited by 33
- 2023ZeroShotDataAug: Generating and Augmenting Training Data with ChatGPTcited by 32
- 2018Back-Translation-Style Data Augmentation for End-to-End ASRcited by 28
- 2021Data Augmentation in Natural Language Processing: A Novel Text Generation Approach for Long and Short Text Classifierscited by 24
- 2022Data Augmentation with Paraphrase Generation and Entity Extraction for Multimodal Dialogue Systemcited by 16
- 2021Data Augmentation in a Hybrid Approach for Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysiscited by 10
- 2023ChatGPT as Data Augmentation for Compositional Generalization: A Case Study in Open Intent Detectioncited by 9
- 2020BET: A Backtranslation Approach for Easy Data Augmentation in Transformer-based Paraphrase Identification Contextcited by 8
- 2023Data Augmentation for Low-Resource Keyphrase Generationcited by 8
- 2021Data Augmentation for Voice-Assistant NLU using BERT-based Interchangeable Rephrasecited by 2
- 2023Three Ways of Using Large Language Models to Evaluate Chatcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.