General Debiasing for Graph-based Collaborative Filtering via Adversarial Graph Dropout
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have shown impressive performance in recommender systems, particularly in collaborative filtering (CF). The key lies in aggregating neighborhood information on a user-item interaction graph to enhance user/item representations. However, we have discovered that this aggregation mechanism comes with a drawback, which amplifies biases present in the interaction graph. For instance, a user's interactions with items can be driven by both unbiased true interest and various biased factors like item popularity or exposure. However, the current aggregation approach combines all information, both biased and unbiased, leading to biased representation learning. Consequently, graph-based recommenders can learn distorted views of users/items, hindering the modeling of their true preferences and generalizations. To address this issue, we introduce a novel framework called Adversarial Graph Dropout (AdvDrop). It differentiates between unbiased and biased interactions, enabling unbiased representation learning. For each user/item, AdvDrop employs adversarial learning to split the neighborhood into two views: one with bias-mitigated interactions and the other with bias-aware interactions. After view-specific aggregation, AdvDrop ensures that the bias-mitigated and bias-aware representations remain invariant, shielding them from the influence of bias. We validate AdvDrop's effectiveness on five public datasets that cover both general and specific biases, demonstrating significant improvements. Furthermore, our method exhibits meaningful separation of subgraphs and achieves unbiased representations for graph-based CF models, as revealed by in-depth analysis. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/Arthurma71/AdvDrop.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024How Do Recommendation Models Amplify Popularity Bias? An Analysis from the Spectral Perspectivecited by 21
- 2024Dual Test-time Training for Out-of-distribution Recommender Systemcited by 16
- 2024Graph Representation Learning via Causal Diffusion for Out-of-Distribution Recommendationcited by 11
- 2025Distributionally Robust Graph Out-of-Distribution Recommendation via Diffusion Modelcited by 7
- 2025PBiLoss: Popularity-Aware Regularization to Improve Fairness in Graph-Based Recommender Systemscited by 0
- 2025Causality-aware Graph Aggregation Weight Estimator for Popularity Debiasing in Top-K Recommendationcited by 0
- 2026Low-pass Personalized Subgraph Federated Recommendationcited by 0
- 2026Low-pass Personalized Subgraph Federated Recommendation20 Mar 2026
- 2025Causality-aware Graph Aggregation Weight Estimator for Popularity Debiasing in Top-K Recommendation6 Oct 2025
- 2025PBiLoss: Popularity-Aware Regularization to Improve Fairness in Graph-Based Recommender Systems25 Jul 2025
- 2025Distributionally Robust Graph Out-of-Distribution Recommendation via Diffusion Model26 Jan 2025
- 2024Graph Representation Learning via Causal Diffusion for Out-of-Distribution Recommendation1 Aug 2024
- 2024Dual Test-time Training for Out-of-distribution Recommender System22 Jul 2024
- 2024How Do Recommendation Models Amplify Popularity Bias? An Analysis from the Spectral Perspective18 Apr 2024