Evaluating the Effectiveness of Index-Based Treatment Allocation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
When resources are scarce, an allocation policy is needed to decide who receives a resource. This problem occurs, for instance, when allocating scarce medical resources and is often solved using modern ML methods. This paper introduces methods to evaluate index-based allocation policies -- that allocate a fixed number of resources to those who need them the most -- by using data from a randomized control trial. Such policies create dependencies between agents, which render the assumptions behind standard statistical tests invalid and limit the effectiveness of estimators. Addressing these challenges, we translate and extend recent ideas from the statistics literature to present an efficient estimator and methods for computing asymptotically correct confidence intervals. This enables us to effectively draw valid statistical conclusions, a critical gap in previous work. Our extensive experiments validate our methodology in practical settings, while also showcasing its statistical power. We conclude by proposing and empirically verifying extensions of our methodology that enable us to reevaluate a past randomized control trial to evaluate different ML allocation policies in the context of a mHealth program, drawing previously invisible conclusions.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Feb 2024.
Builds on
13 of 48 references.
References · 13
- 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 597
- 2020Collapsing Bandits and Their Application to Public Health Interventionscited by 47
- 2023Difficult Lessons on Social Prediction from Wisconsin Public Schoolscited by 35
- 2021Evaluating Treatment Prioritization Rules via Rank-Weighted Average Treatment Effectscited by 29
- 2019Learning to Prescribe Interventions for Tuberculosis Patients Using Digital Adherence Datacited by 21
- 2021Q-Learning Lagrange Policies for Multi-Action Restless Banditscited by 20
- 2022Scalable Decision-Focused Learning in Restless Multi-Armed Bandits with Application to Maternal and Child Healthcited by 12
- 2019Efficient augmentation and relaxation learning for individualized treatment rules using observational datacited by 9
- 2021Treatment Allocation under Uncertain Costscited by 9
- 2022Statistical Inference for Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Discovered by Generic Machine Learning in Randomized Experimentscited by 7
- 2023Equitable Restless Multi-Armed Bandits: A General Framework Inspired By Digital Healthcited by 6
- 2023Improved Policy Evaluation for Randomized Trials of Algorithmic Resource Allocationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4.
5 papers.
- 2024Allocation Requires Prediction Only if Inequality Is Lowcited by 8
- 2025The Value of Prediction in Identifying the Worst-Offcited by 5
- 2025Beyond Listenership: AI-Predicted Interventions Drive Improvements in Maternal Health Behaviourscited by 2
- 2025Fostering the Ecosystem of AI for Social Impact Requires Expanding and Strengthening Evaluation Standardscited by 2
- 2025The Hidden Cost of Waiting for Accurate Predictionscited by 1
- 2025Fostering the Ecosystem of AI for Social Impact Requires Expanding and Strengthening Evaluation Standards21 Oct 2025
- 2025Beyond Listenership: AI-Predicted Interventions Drive Improvements in Maternal Health Behaviours28 Jul 2025
- 2025The Hidden Cost of Waiting for Accurate Predictions1 Mar 2025
- 2025The Value of Prediction in Identifying the Worst-Off31 Jan 2025
- 2024Allocation Requires Prediction Only if Inequality Is Low19 Jun 2024