mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Connect the dots: Dataset Condensation, Differential Privacy, and Adversarial Uncertainty

arXiv 2402.10423 ↗First posted 16 Feb 2024cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Our work focuses on understanding the underpinning mechanism of dataset condensation by drawing connections with (ε, δ)-differential privacy where the optimal noise, ε, is chosen by adversarial uncertainty citeGrining2017. We can answer the question about the inner workings of the dataset condensation procedure. Previous work citedong2022 proved the link between dataset condensation (DC) and (ε, δ)-differential privacy. However, it is unclear from existing works on ablating DC to obtain a lower-bound estimate of ε that will suffice for creating high-fidelity synthetic data. We suggest that adversarial uncertainty is the most appropriate method to achieve an optimal noise level, ε. As part of the internal dynamics of dataset condensation, we adopt a satisfactory scheme for noise estimation that guarantees high-fidelity data while providing privacy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 4 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Feb 2024.

Builds on

3 of 4 references.

References · 3

  1. 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 297
  2. 2022Privacy for Free: How does Dataset Condensation Help Privacy?cited by 120
  3. 2016Towards Extending Noiseless Privacy -- Dependent Data and More Practical Approachcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.