The optimal placement of the head in the noun phrase. The case of demonstrative, numeral, adjective and noun
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The word order of a sentence is shaped by multiple principles. The principle of syntactic dependency distance minimization is in conflict with the principle of surprisal minimization (or predictability maximization) in single head syntactic dependency structures: while the former predicts that the head should be placed at the center of the linear arrangement, the latter predicts that the head should be placed at one of the ends (either first or last). A critical question is when surprisal minimization (or predictability maximization) should surpass syntactic dependency distance minimization. In the context of single head structures, it has been predicted that this is more likely to happen when two conditions are met, i.e. (a) fewer words are involved and (b) words are shorter. Here we test the prediction on the noun phrase when it is composed of a demonstrative, a numeral, an adjective and a noun. We find that, across preferred orders in languages, the noun tends to be placed at one of the ends, confirming the theoretical prediction. We also show evidence of anti locality effects: syntactic dependency distances in preferred orders are longer than expected by chance.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Feb 2024.
Builds on
17 of 72 references.
References · 17
- 2020The optimality of syntactic dependency distancescited by 15
- 2019Anti dependency distance minimization in short sequences. A graph theoretic approachcited by 13
- 2019Optimal coding and the origins of Zipfian lawscited by 10
- 2017The placement of the head that maximizes predictability. An information theoretic approachcited by 9
- 2021Minimum projective linearizations of trees in linear timecited by 9
- 2013The placement of the head that minimizes online memory: a complex systems approachcited by 8
- 2016The scarcity of crossing dependencies: a direct outcome of a specific constraint?cited by 7
- 2015Kauffman's adjacent possible in word order evolutioncited by 6
- 2019Memory limitations are hidden in grammarcited by 6
- 2013Compression as a universal principle of animal behaviorcited by 5
- 2023Linguistic laws in biologycited by 5
- 2023Swap distance minimization in SOV languages. Cognitive and mathematical foundationscited by 5
5 more
- 2013Hubiness, length, crossings and their relationships in dependency treescited by 4
- 2023Direct and indirect evidence of compression of word lengths. Zipf's law of abbreviation revisitedcited by 4
- 2014A stronger null hypothesis for crossing dependenciescited by 3
- 2022The distribution of syntactic dependency distancescited by 3
- 2014Reply to the commentary "Be careful when assuming the obvious", by P. Aldaycited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2024Swap distance minimization beyond entropy minimization in word order variationcited by 4
- 2024Predictability maximization and the origins of word order harmonycited by 1
- 2025Who is the root in a syntactic dependency structure?cited by 1
- 2026Ease of dependency distance minimization in star-like structurescited by 0
- 2026Factors Influencing the Emergence of Dependency Length Minimization in Neural Agent Simulationscited by 0
- 2026Factors Influencing the Emergence of Dependency Length Minimization in Neural Agent Simulations5 Sep 2026
- 2026Ease of dependency distance minimization in star-like structures30 Apr 2026
- 2025Who is the root in a syntactic dependency structure?25 Jan 2025
- 2024Predictability maximization and the origins of word order harmony29 Aug 2024
- 2024Swap distance minimization beyond entropy minimization in word order variation22 Apr 2024