mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

When Representations Align: Universality in Representation Learning Dynamics

arXiv 2402.09142 ↗First posted 14 Feb 2024cs.LG q-bio.NCcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks come in many sizes and architectures. The choice of architecture, in conjunction with the dataset and learning algorithm, is commonly understood to affect the learned neural representations. Yet, recent results have shown that different architectures learn representations with striking qualitative similarities. Here we derive an effective theory of representation learning under the assumption that the encoding map from input to hidden representation and the decoding map from representation to output are arbitrary smooth functions. This theory schematizes representation learning dynamics in the regime of complex, large architectures, where hidden representations are not strongly constrained by the parametrization. We show through experiments that the effective theory describes aspects of representation learning dynamics across a range of deep networks with different activation functions and architectures, and exhibits phenomena similar to the "rich" and "lazy" regime. While many network behaviors depend quantitatively on architecture, our findings point to certain behaviors that are widely conserved once models are sufficiently flexible.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Feb 2024.

Builds on

25 of 49 references.

References · 25

  1. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  2. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
  3. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,597
  4. 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 748
  5. 2019Wide Neural Networks of Any Depth Evolve as Linear Models Under Gradient Descentcited by 732
  6. 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 671
  7. 2017The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Separable Datacited by 649
  8. 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 572
  9. 2018A Mean Field View of the Landscape of Two-Layers Neural Networkscited by 463
  10. 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 339
  11. 2020Kernel and Rich Regimes in Overparametrized Modelscited by 302
  12. 2020Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent for Wide Two-layer Neural Networks Trained with the Logistic Losscited by 267
13 more
  1. 2016Exponential expressivity in deep neural networks through transient chaoscited by 260
  2. 2018Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Linear Convolutional Networkscited by 251
  3. 2016Deep Learning without Poor Local Minimacited by 233
  4. 2019Mean-field theory of two-layers neural networks: dimension-free bounds and kernel limitcited by 187
  5. 2018Dynamical Isometry and a Mean Field Theory of CNNs: How to Train 10,000-Layer Vanilla Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 176
  6. 2018An analytic theory of generalization dynamics and transfer learning in deep linear networkscited by 84
  7. 2019Universality and individuality in neural dynamics across large populations of recurrent networkscited by 61
  8. 2023Saddle-to-Saddle Dynamics in Diagonal Linear Networkscited by 54
  9. 2019The Local Elasticity of Neural Networkscited by 37
  10. 2022The Neural Race Reduction: Dynamics of Abstraction in Gated Networkscited by 37
  11. 2021Grounding inductive biases in natural images:invariance stems from variations in datacited by 25
  12. 2022The Onset of Variance-Limited Behavior for Networks in the Lazy and Rich Regimescited by 25
  13. 2021Imitating Deep Learning Dynamics via Locally Elastic Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

10 papers.