Why Studying Cut-ins? Comparing Cut-ins and Other Lane Changes Based on Naturalistic Driving Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Extensive research has been conducted to explore vehicle lane changes, while the study on cut-ins has not received sufficient attention. The existing studies have not addressed the fundamental question of why studying cut-ins is crucial, despite the extensive investigation into lane changes. To tackle this issue, it is important to demonstrate how cut-ins, as a special type of lane change, differ from other lane changes. In this paper, we explore to compare driving characteristics of cut-ins and other lane changes based on naturalistic driving data. The highD dataset is employed to conduct the comparison. We extract all lane-change events from the dataset and exclude events that are not suitable for our comparison. Lane-change events are then categorized into the cut-in events and other lane-change events based on various gap-based rules. Several performance metrics are designed to measure the driving characteristics of the two types of events. We prove the significant differences between the cut-in behavior and other lane-change behavior by using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The results suggest the necessity of conducting specialized studies on cut-ins, offering valuable insights for future research in this field.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Feb 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.