mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Uncertainty to Precision: Enhancing Binary Classifier Performance through Calibration

arXiv 2402.07790 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2024cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The assessment of binary classifier performance traditionally centers on discriminative ability using metrics, such as accuracy. However, these metrics often disregard the model's inherent uncertainty, especially when dealing with sensitive decision-making domains, such as finance or healthcare. Given that model-predicted scores are commonly seen as event probabilities, calibration is crucial for accurate interpretation. In our study, we analyze the sensitivity of various calibration measures to score distortions and introduce a refined metric, the Local Calibration Score. Comparing recalibration methods, we advocate for local regressions, emphasizing their dual role as effective recalibration tools and facilitators of smoother visualizations. We apply these findings in a real-world scenario using Random Forest classifier and regressor to predict credit default while simultaneously measuring calibration during performance optimization.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2024.

Builds on

6 of 25 references.

References · 6

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  2. 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 387
  3. 2020Improving model calibration with accuracy versus uncertainty optimizationcited by 123
  4. 2021Don't Just Blame Over-parametrization for Over-confidence: Theoretical Analysis of Calibration in Binary Classificationcited by 39
  5. 2022Propensity score models are better when post-calibratedcited by 2
  6. 2024Geospatial Disparities: A Case Study on Real Estate Prices in Pariscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.