Comparing the willingness to share for human-generated vs. AI-generated fake news
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) presents large risks for society when it is used to create fake news. A crucial factor for fake news to go viral on social media is that users share such content. Here, we aim to shed light on the sharing behavior of users across human-generated vs. AI-generated fake news. Specifically, we study: (1) What is the perceived veracity of human-generated fake news vs. AI-generated fake news? (2) What is the user's willingness to share human-generated fake news vs. AI-generated fake news on social media? (3) What socio-economic characteristics let users fall for AI-generated fake news? To this end, we conducted a pre-registered, online experiment with N= 988 subjects and 20 fake news from the COVID-19 pandemic generated by GPT-4 vs. humans. Our findings show that AI-generated fake news is perceived as less accurate than human-generated fake news, but both tend to be shared equally. Further, several socio-economic factors explain who falls for AI-generated fake news.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2024A Survey of AI-generated Text Forensic Systems: Detection, Attribution, and Characterizationcited by 18
- 2024Large language models can consistently generate high-quality content for election disinformation operationscited by 13
- 2025Characterizing LLM-driven Social Network: The Chirper.ai Casecited by 9
- 2024Lying Blindly: Bypassing ChatGPT's Safeguards to Generate Hard-to-Detect Disinformation Claimscited by 3
- 2024METR: Image Watermarking with Large Number of Unique Messagescited by 3
- 2024Taxonomy to Regulation: A (Geo)Political Taxonomy for AI Risks and Regulatory Measures in the EU AI Actcited by 1
- 2025From Generation to Detection: A Multimodal Multi-Task Dataset for Benchmarking Health Misinformationcited by 1
- 2025Designing Effective Digital Literacy Interventions for Boosting Deepfake Discernmentcited by 1
- 2026Addressing Data Scarcity in Bangla Fake News Detection: An LLM-Based Dataset Augmentation Approachcited by 1
- 2024Evaluating the Propensity of Generative AI for Producing Harmful Disinformation During the 2024 US Election Cyclecited by 0
- 2025Images Amplify Misinformation Sharing in Vision-Language Modelscited by 0
- 2025Do small language models generate realistic variable-quality fake news headlines?cited by 0
- 2026Addressing Data Scarcity in Bangla Fake News Detection: An LLM-Based Dataset Augmentation Approach2 May 2026
- 2025Do small language models generate realistic variable-quality fake news headlines?31 Aug 2025
- 2025Designing Effective Digital Literacy Interventions for Boosting Deepfake Discernment31 Jul 2025
- 2025From Generation to Detection: A Multimodal Multi-Task Dataset for Benchmarking Health Misinformation24 May 2025
- 2025Images Amplify Misinformation Sharing in Vision-Language Models19 May 2025
- 2025Characterizing LLM-driven Social Network: The Chirper.ai Case14 Apr 2025
- 2024Evaluating the Propensity of Generative AI for Producing Harmful Disinformation During the 2024 US Election Cycle9 Nov 2024
- 2024METR: Image Watermarking with Large Number of Unique Messages15 Aug 2024
- 2024Large language models can consistently generate high-quality content for election disinformation operations13 Aug 2024
- 2024Taxonomy to Regulation: A (Geo)Political Taxonomy for AI Risks and Regulatory Measures in the EU AI Act17 Apr 2024
- 2024A Survey of AI-generated Text Forensic Systems: Detection, Attribution, and Characterization2 Mar 2024
- 2024Lying Blindly: Bypassing ChatGPT's Safeguards to Generate Hard-to-Detect Disinformation Claims13 Feb 2024