mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Comparing the willingness to share for human-generated vs. AI-generated fake news

arXiv 2402.07395 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2024cs.SI physics.soc-phcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) presents large risks for society when it is used to create fake news. A crucial factor for fake news to go viral on social media is that users share such content. Here, we aim to shed light on the sharing behavior of users across human-generated vs. AI-generated fake news. Specifically, we study: (1) What is the perceived veracity of human-generated fake news vs. AI-generated fake news? (2) What is the user's willingness to share human-generated fake news vs. AI-generated fake news on social media? (3) What socio-economic characteristics let users fall for AI-generated fake news? To this end, we conducted a pre-registered, online experiment with N= 988 subjects and 20 fake news from the COVID-19 pandemic generated by GPT-4 vs. humans. Our findings show that AI-generated fake news is perceived as less accurate than human-generated fake news, but both tend to be shared equally. Further, several socio-economic factors explain who falls for AI-generated fake news.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

12 papers.