mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Accuracy of TextFooler black box adversarial attacks on 01 loss sign activation neural network ensemble

arXiv 2402.07347 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent work has shown the defense of 01 loss sign activation neural networks against image classification adversarial attacks. A public challenge to attack the models on CIFAR10 dataset remains undefeated. We ask the following question in this study: are 01 loss sign activation neural networks hard to deceive with a popular black box text adversarial attack program called TextFooler? We study this question on four popular text classification datasets: IMDB reviews, Yelp reviews, MR sentiment classification, and AG news classification. We find that our 01 loss sign activation network is much harder to attack with TextFooler compared to sigmoid activation cross entropy and binary neural networks. We also study a 01 loss sign activation convolutional neural network with a novel global pooling step specific to sign activation networks. With this new variation we see a significant gain in adversarial accuracy rendering TextFooler practically useless against it. We make our code freely available at urlhttps://github.com/zero-one-loss/wordcnn01 and urlhttps://github.com/xyzacademic/mlp01example. Our work here suggests that 01 loss sign activation networks could be further developed to create fool proof models against text adversarial attacks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2024.

Builds on

11 of 22 references.

References · 11

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
  3. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,268
  4. 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,127
  5. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
  6. 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 671
  7. 2018Bi-Real Net: Enhancing the Performance of 1-bit CNNs With Improved Representational Capability and Advanced Training Algorithmcited by 235
  8. 2019Adversarial Training Can Hurt Generalizationcited by 132
  9. 2022Why adversarial training can hurt robust accuracycited by 14
  10. 2020On the transferability of adversarial examples between convex and 01 loss modelscited by 2
  11. 2020Towards adversarial robustness with 01 loss neural networkscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026SoK: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Current Status of Neural Tangent Generalization Attacks with Research Directions
  2. 2025FeatureFool: Zero-Query Fooling of Video Models via Feature Map
  3. 2025Multi-task Adversarial Attacks against Black-box Model with Few-shot Queries
  4. 2026Adversarial Attacks on Deep OCR Systems
  5. 2023Are aligned neural networks adversarially aligned?
  6. 2025Tougher Text, Smarter Models: Raising the Bar for Adversarial Defence Benchmarks
  7. 2024The Impact of Quantization on the Robustness of Transformer-based Text Classifiers
  8. 2025Layer-Wise Perturbations via Sparse Autoencoders for Adversarial Text Generation