mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluation Metrics for Automated Typographic Poster Generation

arXiv 2402.06945 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2024cs.MM cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Computational Design approaches facilitate the generation of typographic design, but evaluating these designs remains a challenging task. In this paper, we propose a set of heuristic metrics for typographic design evaluation, focusing on their legibility, which assesses the text visibility, aesthetics, which evaluates the visual quality of the design, and semantic features, which estimate how effectively the design conveys the content semantics. We experiment with a constrained evolutionary approach for generating typographic posters, incorporating the proposed evaluation metrics with varied setups, and treating the legibility metrics as constraints. We also integrate emotion recognition to identify text semantics automatically and analyse the performance of the approach and the visual characteristics outputs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2024.

Builds on

2 of 22 references.

References · 2

  1. 2017Learning Visual Importance for Graphic Designs and Data Visualizationscited by 22
  2. 2021Agile (data) science: a (draft) manifestocited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.