Exploring Group and Symmetry Principles in Large Language Models
On the map: LLM reasoning → Mathematical reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance across a wide range of applications; however, assessing their reasoning capabilities remains a significant challenge. In this paper, we introduce a framework grounded in group and symmetry principles, which have played a crucial role in fields such as physics and mathematics, and offer another way to evaluate their capabilities. While the proposed framework is general, to showcase the benefits of employing these properties, we focus on arithmetic reasoning and investigate the performance of these models on four group properties: closure, identity, inverse, and associativity. Our findings reveal that LLMs studied in this work struggle to preserve group properties across different test regimes. In the closure test, we observe biases towards specific outputs and an abrupt degradation in their performance from 100% to 0% after a specific sequence length. They also perform poorly in the identity test, which represents adding irrelevant information in the context, and show sensitivity when subjected to inverse test, which examines the robustness of the model with respect to negation. In addition, we demonstrate that breaking down problems into smaller steps helps LLMs in the associativity test that we have conducted. To support these tests we have developed a synthetic dataset which will be released.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Mathematical reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 13 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2024.
Builds on
13 of 45 references.
References · 13
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2023Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4cited by 2,579
- 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2023Large Language Models Can Be Easily Distracted by Irrelevant Contextcited by 820
- 2022Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-Thoughtcited by 334
- 2023Orca 2: Teaching Small Language Models How to Reasoncited by 157
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models: Assessing Logical and Arithmetic Errors across Wide Numerical Ranges
- 2026Probing Structural Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models with Algebraic Trapdoors
- 2025Do LLMs Overthink Basic Math Reasoning? Benchmarking the Accuracy-Efficiency Tradeoff in Language Models
- 2024Can Large Language Models put 2 and 2 together? Probing for Entailed Arithmetical Relationships
- 2024Are Your LLMs Capable of Stable Reasoning?
- 2024A Careful Examination of Large Language Model Performance on Grade School Arithmetic
- 2025Large Language Models and Mathematical Reasoning Failures
- 2024Exploring Mathematical Extrapolation of Large Language Models with Synthetic Data