Version age-based client scheduling policy for federated learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a privacy-preserving machine learning paradigm facilitating collaborative training across multiple clients without sharing local data. Despite advancements in edge device capabilities, communication bottlenecks present challenges in aggregating a large number of clients; only a portion of the clients can update their parameters upon each global aggregation. This phenomenon introduces the critical challenge of stragglers in FL and the profound impact of client scheduling policies on global model convergence and stability. Existing scheduling strategies address staleness but predominantly focus on either timeliness or content. Motivated by this, we introduce the novel concept of Version Age of Information (VAoI) to FL. Unlike traditional Age of Information metrics, VAoI considers both timeliness and content staleness. Each client's version age is updated discretely, indicating the freshness of information. VAoI is incorporated into the client scheduling policy to minimize the average VAoI, mitigating the impact of outdated local updates and enhancing the stability of FL systems.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2024.
Builds on
16 of 24 references.
References · 16
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
- 2019Measuring the Effects of Non-Identical Data Distribution for Federated Visual Classificationcited by 836
- 2019Scheduling Policies for Federated Learning in Wireless Networkscited by 131
- 2018LAG: Lazily Aggregated Gradient for Communication-Efficient Distributed Learningcited by 95
- 2021On Large-Cohort Training for Federated Learningcited by 73
- 2020Multi-Armed Bandit Based Client Scheduling for Federated Learningcited by 56
- 2019Age-Based Scheduling Policy for Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networkscited by 39
- 2018Efficient Decentralized Deep Learning by Dynamic Model Averagingcited by 30
- 2022Taming Fat-Tailed ("Heavier-Tailed'' with Potentially Infinite Variance) Noise in Federated Learningcited by 10
- 2021The Age of Gossip in Networkscited by 7
4 more
- 2018The Cost of Delay in Status Updates and their Value: Non-linear Ageingcited by 5
- 2021Version Age of Information in Clustered Gossip Networkscited by 4
- 2023Version Age-Optimal Cached Status Updates in a Gossiping Network with Energy Harvesting Sensorcited by 3
- 2023Value of Information and Timing-aware Scheduling for Federated Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025Battery-aware Cyclic Scheduling in Energy-harvesting Federated Learningcited by 2
- 2026Diffusion Model-based Reinforcement Learning for Version Age of Information Scheduling: Average and Tail-Risk-Sensitive Controlcited by 1
- 2024CAFe: Cost and Age aware Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2025Feature-Based Semantics-Aware Scheduling for Energy-Harvesting Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2026Mixed-Timescale Differential Coding for Downlink Model Broadcast in Wireless Federated Learningcited by 0
- 2026Mixed-Timescale Differential Coding for Downlink Model Broadcast in Wireless Federated Learning14 Jul 2026
- 2026Diffusion Model-based Reinforcement Learning for Version Age of Information Scheduling: Average and Tail-Risk-Sensitive Control26 Jan 2026
- 2025Feature-Based Semantics-Aware Scheduling for Energy-Harvesting Federated Learning1 Dec 2025
- 2025Battery-aware Cyclic Scheduling in Energy-harvesting Federated Learning16 Apr 2025
- 2024CAFe: Cost and Age aware Federated Learning24 May 2024