On the Effect of Image Resolution on Semantic Segmentation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
High-resolution semantic segmentation requires substantial computational resources. Traditional approaches in the field typically downscale the input images before processing and then upscale the low-resolution outputs back to their original dimensions. While this strategy effectively identifies broad regions, it often misses finer details. In this study, we demonstrate that a streamlined model capable of directly producing high-resolution segmentations can match the performance of more complex systems that generate lower-resolution results. By simplifying the network architecture, we enable the processing of images at their native resolution. Our approach leverages a bottom-up information propagation technique across various scales, which we have empirically shown to enhance segmentation accuracy. We have rigorously tested our method using leading-edge semantic segmentation datasets. Specifically, for the Cityscapes dataset, we further boost accuracy by applying the Noisy Student Training technique.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2024.
Builds on
33 of 47 references.
References · 33
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
- 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
- 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
- 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
- 2016Pyramid Scene Parsing Networkcited by 2,472
21 more
- 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,290
- 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
- 2015SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentationcited by 1,483
- 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Visual Recognitioncited by 1,417
- 2019Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationcited by 1,304
- 2019Segmentation Transformer: Object-Contextual Representations for Semantic Segmentationcited by 573
- 2020ResNeSt: Split-Attention Networkscited by 445
- 2015Learning Deconvolution Network for Semantic Segmentationcited by 365
- 2019Billion-scale semi-supervised learning for image classificationcited by 232
- 2020Hierarchical Multi-Scale Attention for Semantic Segmentationcited by 183
- 2020EfficientPS: Efficient Panoptic Segmentationcited by 111
- 2016Full-Resolution Residual Networks for Semantic Segmentation in Street Scenescited by 71
- 2017Image-based Localization using Hourglass Networkscited by 63
- 2017Residual Conv-Deconv Grid Network for Semantic Segmentationcited by 57
- 2016Fast, Exact and Multi-Scale Inference for Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Gaussian CRFscited by 27
- 2019Global Aggregation then Local Distribution in Fully Convolutional Networkscited by 22
- 2018Interlinked Convolutional Neural Networks for Face Parsingcited by 16
- 2023Sentence Attention Blocks for Answer Groundingcited by 8
- 2022Semantic Segmentation using Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 6
- 2023Empowering Visually Impaired Individuals: A Novel Use of Apple Live Photos and Android Motion Photoscited by 6
- 2023Improving Normalization with the James-Stein Estimatorcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.