POLARIS: A framework to guide the development of Trustworthy AI systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the ever-expanding landscape of Artificial Intelligence (AI), where innovation thrives and new products and services are continuously being delivered, ensuring that AI systems are designed and developed responsibly throughout their entire lifecycle is crucial. To this end, several AI ethics principles and guidelines have been issued to which AI systems should conform. Nevertheless, relying solely on high-level AI ethics principles is far from sufficient to ensure the responsible engineering of AI systems. In this field, AI professionals often navigate by sight. Indeed, while recommendations promoting Trustworthy AI (TAI) exist, these are often high-level statements that are difficult to translate into concrete implementation strategies. There is a significant gap between high-level AI ethics principles and low-level concrete practices for AI professionals. To address this challenge, our work presents an experience report where we develop a novel holistic framework for Trustworthy AI - designed to bridge the gap between theory and practice - and report insights from its application in an industrial case study. The framework is built on the result of a systematic review of the state of the practice, a survey, and think-aloud interviews with 34 AI practitioners. The framework, unlike most of those already in the literature, is designed to provide actionable guidelines and tools to support different types of stakeholders throughout the entire Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). Our goal is to empower AI professionals to confidently navigate the ethical dimensions of TAI through practical insights, ensuring that the vast potential of AI is exploited responsibly for the benefit of society as a whole.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2024.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3.
4 papers.
- 2024Towards More Trustworthy and Interpretable LLMs for Code through Syntax-Grounded Explanationscited by 10
- 2025Mapping the Trust Terrain: LLMs in Software Engineering -- Insights and Perspectivescited by 0
- 2025Lessons Learned from the Use of Generative AI in Engineering and Quality Assurance of a WEB System for Healthcarecited by 0
- 2025Evaluation of AI Ethics Tools in Language Models: A Developers' Perspective Case Studycited by 0
- 2025Evaluation of AI Ethics Tools in Language Models: A Developers' Perspective Case Study16 Dec 2025
- 2025Lessons Learned from the Use of Generative AI in Engineering and Quality Assurance of a WEB System for Healthcare1 Nov 2025
- 2025Mapping the Trust Terrain: LLMs in Software Engineering -- Insights and Perspectives18 Mar 2025
- 2024Towards More Trustworthy and Interpretable LLMs for Code through Syntax-Grounded Explanations12 Jul 2024