Voronoi Candidates for Bayesian Optimization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Bayesian optimization (BO) offers an elegant approach for efficiently optimizing black-box functions. However, acquisition criteria demand their own challenging inner-optimization, which can induce significant overhead. Many practical BO methods, particularly in high dimension, eschew a formal, continuous optimization of the acquisition function and instead search discretely over a finite set of space-filling candidates. Here, we propose to use candidates which lie on the boundary of the Voronoi tessellation of the current design points, so they are equidistant to two or more of them. We discuss strategies for efficient implementation by directly sampling the Voronoi boundary without explicitly generating the tessellation, thus accommodating large designs in high dimension. On a battery of test problems optimized via Gaussian processes with expected improvement, our proposed approach significantly improves the execution time of a multi-start continuous search without a loss in accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Feb 2024.
Builds on
16 of 53 references.
References · 16
- 2016OpenAI Gymcited by 1,684
- 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 734
- 2013Gaussian Processes for Big Datacited by 377
- 2019Scalable Global Optimization via Local Bayesian Optimizationcited by 359
- 2023Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian Optimizationcited by 144
- 2017Batched Large-scale Bayesian Optimization in High-dimensional Spacescited by 116
- 2020Learning Search Space Partition for Black-box Optimization using Monte Carlo Tree Searchcited by 87
- 2021Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization over High-Dimensional Search Spacescited by 87
- 2020Scalable Constrained Bayesian Optimizationcited by 84
- 2013Local Gaussian process approximation for large computer experimentscited by 59
- 2017Batched High-dimensional Bayesian Optimization via Structural Kernel Learningcited by 51
- 2020Active Learning for Deep Gaussian Process Surrogatescited by 38
4 more
- 2018Vecchia approximations of Gaussian-process predictionscited by 21
- 2021Triangulation candidates for Bayesian optimizationcited by 11
- 2024Enhancing Gaussian Process Surrogates for Optimization and Posterior Approximation via Random Explorationcited by 7
- 2022Latin Hypercubes and Space-filling Designscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3.
5 papers.
- 2025Improving LLM-based Global Optimization with Search Space Partitioningcited by 6
- 2025Bayesian Optimization with Inexact Acquisition: Is Random Grid Search Sufficient?cited by 4
- 2024Accelerated Inference for Partially Observed Markov Processes using Automatic Differentiationcited by 0
- 2024Scalable Batch Bayesian Optimization Via Subspace Acquisition Functionscited by 0
- 2025Actively Learning Joint Contours of Multiple Computer Experimentscited by 0
- 2025Actively Learning Joint Contours of Multiple Computer Experiments15 Dec 2025
- 2025Bayesian Optimization with Inexact Acquisition: Is Random Grid Search Sufficient?13 Jun 2025
- 2025Improving LLM-based Global Optimization with Search Space Partitioning27 May 2025
- 2024Scalable Batch Bayesian Optimization Via Subspace Acquisition Functions25 Nov 2024
- 2024Accelerated Inference for Partially Observed Markov Processes using Automatic Differentiation3 Jul 2024