Decentralized Blockchain-based Robust Multi-agent Multi-armed Bandit
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study a robust, i.e. in presence of malicious participants, multi-agent multi-armed bandit problem where multiple participants are distributed on a fully decentralized blockchain, with the possibility of some being malicious. The rewards of arms are homogeneous among the honest participants, following time-invariant stochastic distributions, which are revealed to the participants only when certain conditions are met to ensure that the coordination mechanism is secure enough. The coordination mechanism's objective is to efficiently ensure the cumulative rewards gained by the honest participants are maximized. To this end, we are the first to incorporate advanced techniques from blockchains, as well as novel mechanisms, into such a cooperative decision making framework to design optimal strategies for honest participants. This framework allows various malicious behaviors and the maintenance of security and participant privacy. More specifically, we select a pool of validators who communicate to all participants, design a new consensus mechanism based on digital signatures for these validators, invent a UCB-based strategy that requires less information from participants through secure multi-party computation, and design the chain-participant interaction and an incentive mechanism to encourage participants' participation. Notably, we are the first to prove the theoretical regret of the proposed algorithm and claim its optimality. Unlike existing work that integrates blockchains with learning problems such as federated learning which mainly focuses on optimality via computational experiments, we demonstrate that the regret of honest participants is upper bounded by logT under certain assumptions. The regret bound is consistent with the multi-agent multi-armed bandit problem, both without malicious participants and with purely Byzantine attacks which do not affect the entire system.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2024.
Builds on
18 of 48 references.
References · 18
- 2021Federated Linear Contextual Banditscited by 61
- 2020Federated Bandit: A Gossiping Approachcited by 55
- 2016Distributed Cooperative Decision-Making in Multiarmed Bandits: Frequentist and Bayesian Algorithmscited by 48
- 2020Distributed Cooperative Decision Making in Multi-agent Multi-armed Banditscited by 38
- 2015On Distributed Cooperative Decision-Making in Multiarmed Banditscited by 33
- 2021Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Bandits with Limited Communicationcited by 29
- 2021Optimal Rates of (Locally) Differentially Private Heavy-tailed Multi-Armed Banditscited by 25
- 2020Robust Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Banditscited by 20
- 2021Exploiting Heterogeneity in Robust Federated Best-Arm Identificationcited by 20
- 2022Near-Optimal Collaborative Learning in Banditscited by 18
- 2020Multitask Bandit Learning Through Heterogeneous Feedback Aggregationcited by 14
- 2023Decentralized Randomly Distributed Multi-agent Multi-armed Bandit with Heterogeneous Rewardscited by 11
6 more
- 2022Private and Byzantine-Proof Cooperative Decision-Makingcited by 9
- 2023Byzantine-Robust Distributed Online Learning: Taming Adversarial Participants in An Adversarial Environmentcited by 8
- 2020A comprehensive survey on smart contract construction and execution: paradigms, tools, and systemscited by 4
- 2023Byzantine-Resilient Decentralized Multi-Armed Banditscited by 3
- 2017Adding Concurrency to Smart Contractscited by 2
- 2023Regret Lower Bounds in Multi-agent Multi-armed Banditcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026Bandit Learning in General Open Multi-agent Systemscited by 0
- 2026Bandit Learning in General Open Multi-agent Systems7 May 2026