Expediting In-Network Federated Learning by Voting-Based Consensus Model Compression
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, federated learning (FL) has gained momentum because of its capability in preserving data privacy. To conduct model training by FL, multiple clients exchange model updates with a parameter server via Internet. To accelerate the communication speed, it has been explored to deploy a programmable switch (PS) in lieu of the parameter server to coordinate clients. The challenge to deploy the PS in FL lies in its scarce memory space, prohibiting running memory consuming aggregation algorithms on the PS. To overcome this challenge, we propose Federated Learning in-network Aggregation with Compression (FediAC) algorithm, consisting of two phases: client voting and model aggregating. In the former phase, clients report their significant model update indices to the PS to estimate global significant model updates. In the latter phase, clients upload global significant model updates to the PS for aggregation. FediAC consumes much less memory space and communication traffic than existing works because the first phase can guarantee consensus compression across clients. The PS easily aligns model update indices to swiftly complete aggregation in the second phase. Finally, we conduct extensive experiments by using public datasets to demonstrate that FediAC remarkably surpasses the state-of-the-art baselines in terms of model accuracy and communication traffic.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2024.
Builds on
21 of 38 references.
References · 21
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
- 2019On the Convergence of FedAvg on Non-IID Datacited by 1,229
- 2021Model-Contrastive Federated Learningcited by 766
- 2021Transformer in Transformercited by 633
- 2017In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unitcited by 618
- 2018signSGD: Compressed Optimisation for Non-Convex Problemscited by 571
- 2017Deep Gradient Compression: Reducing the Communication Bandwidth for Distributed Trainingcited by 478
- 2018Adaptive Federated Learning in Resource Constrained Edge Computing Systemscited by 409
- 2019Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Networks: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 408
- 2018Sparsified SGD with Memorycited by 376
9 more
- 2017TernGrad: Ternary Gradients to Reduce Communication in Distributed Deep Learningcited by 256
- 2021Achieving Linear Speedup with Partial Worker Participation in Non-IID Federated Learningcited by 193
- 2019Federated Learning over Wireless Networks: Convergence Analysis and Resource Allocationcited by 94
- 2019Scaling Distributed Machine Learning with In-Network Aggregationcited by 65
- 2020Ternary Compression for Communication-Efficient Federated Learningcited by 57
- 2021An Efficient Statistical-based Gradient Compression Technique for Distributed Training Systemscited by 32
- 2021CFedAvg: Achieving Efficient Communication and Fast Convergence in Non-IID Federated Learningcited by 7
- 2018C2TCP: A Flexible Cellular TCP to Meet Stringent Delay Requirementscited by 2
- 2022Enabling Fast and Flexible Distributed Deep Learning with Programmable Switchescited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.
2 papers.