mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Respect the model: Fine-grained and Robust Explanation with Sharing Ratio Decomposition

arXiv 2402.03348 ↗First posted 25 Jan 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The truthfulness of existing explanation methods in authentically elucidating the underlying model's decision-making process has been questioned. Existing methods have deviated from faithfully representing the model, thus susceptible to adversarial attacks. To address this, we propose a novel eXplainable AI (XAI) method called SRD (Sharing Ratio Decomposition), which sincerely reflects the model's inference process, resulting in significantly enhanced robustness in our explanations. Different from the conventional emphasis on the neuronal level, we adopt a vector perspective to consider the intricate nonlinear interactions between filters. We also introduce an interesting observation termed Activation-Pattern-Only Prediction (APOP), letting us emphasize the importance of inactive neurons and redefine relevance encapsulating all relevant information including both active and inactive neurons. Our method, SRD, allows for the recursive decomposition of a Pointwise Feature Vector (PFV), providing a high-resolution Effective Receptive Field (ERF) at any layer.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2024.

Builds on

26 of 36 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  4. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  5. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  6. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  7. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  8. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  9. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  10. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
  11. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
  12. 2019Score-CAM: Score-Weighted Visual Explanations for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 575
14 more
  1. 2017Understanding the Effective Receptive Field in Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 549
  2. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  3. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
  4. 2016Top-down Neural Attention by Excitation Backpropcited by 318
  5. 2015Explaining NonLinear Classification Decisions with Deep Taylor Decompositioncited by 248
  6. 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 215
  7. 2019Full-Gradient Representation for Neural Network Visualizationcited by 189
  8. 2020Evaluating and Aggregating Feature-based Model Explanationscited by 185
  9. 2022CRAFT: Concept Recursive Activation FacTorization for Explainabilitycited by 177
  10. 2022Quantus: An Explainable AI Toolkit for Responsible Evaluation of Neural Network Explanations and Beyondcited by 171
  11. 2020Axiom-based Grad-CAM: Towards Accurate Visualization and Explanation of CNNscited by 151
  12. 2021Large-scale Unsupervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 98
  13. 2019Towards Best Practice in Explaining Neural Network Decisions with LRPcited by 70
  14. 2022Shortcomings of Top-Down Randomization-Based Sanity Checks for Evaluations of Deep Neural Network Explanationscited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

6 papers.