mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning solutions of parametric Navier-Stokes with physics-informed neural networks

arXiv 2402.03153 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2024cs.CE cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We leverage Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) to learn solution functions of parametric Navier-Stokes Equations (NSE). Our proposed approach results in a feasible optimization problem setup that bypasses PINNs' limitations in converging to solutions of highly nonlinear parametric-PDEs like NSE. We consider the parameter(s) of interest as inputs of PINNs along with spatio-temporal coordinates, and train PINNs on generated numerical solutions of parametric-PDES for instances of the parameters. We perform experiments on the classical 2D flow past cylinder problem aiming to learn velocities and pressure functions over a range of Reynolds numbers as parameter of interest. Provision of training data from generated numerical simulations allows for interpolation of the solution functions for a range of parameters. Therefore, we compare PINNs with unconstrained conventional Neural Networks (NN) on this problem setup to investigate the effectiveness of considering the PDEs regularization in the loss function. We show that our proposed approach results in optimizing PINN models that learn the solution functions while making sure that flow predictions are in line with conservational laws of mass and momentum. Our results show that PINN results in accurate prediction of gradients compared to NN model, this is clearly visible in predicted vorticity fields given that none of these models were trained on vorticity labels.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2024.

Builds on

15 of 23 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  2. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,214
  3. 2020Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domainscited by 2,170
  4. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
  5. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 629
  6. 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 617
  7. 2021Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnetscited by 537
  8. 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 516
  9. 2022PDEBENCH: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learningcited by 396
  10. 2020On the eigenvector bias of Fourier feature networks: From regression to solving multi-scale PDEs with physics-informed neural networkscited by 279
  11. 2021Efficient training of physics-informed neural networks via importance samplingcited by 109
  12. 2018Hidden Fluid Mechanics: A Navier-Stokes Informed Deep Learning Framework for Assimilating Flow Visualization Datacited by 36
3 more
  1. 2021A novel meta-learning initialization method for physics-informed neural networkscited by 35
  2. 2021A Metalearning Approach for Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs): Application to Parameterized PDEscited by 31
  3. 2021An extended physics informed neural network for preliminary analysis of parametric optimal control problemscited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

4 papers.