mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Review on Fault Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Control Scheme for Robotic Manipulators: Recent Advances in AI, Machine Learning, and Digital Twin

arXiv 2402.02980 ↗First posted 5 Feb 2024cs.RO cs.LG cs.SYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This comprehensive review article delves into the intricate realm of fault-tolerant control (FTC) schemes tailored for robotic manipulators. Our exploration spans the historical evolution of FTC, tracing its development over time, and meticulously examines the recent breakthroughs fueled by the synergistic integration of cutting-edge technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and digital twin technologies (DTT). The article places a particular emphasis on the transformative influence these contemporary trends exert on the landscape of robotic manipulator control and fault tolerance. By delving into the historical context, our aim is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the evolution of FTC schemes. This journey encompasses the transition from model-based and signal-based schemes to the role of sensors, setting the stage for an exploration of the present-day paradigm shift enabled by AI, ML, and DTT. The narrative unfolds as we dissect the intricate interplay between these advanced technologies and their applications in enhancing fault tolerance within the domain of robotic manipulators. Our review critically evaluates the impact of these advancements, shedding light on the novel methodologies, techniques, and applications that have emerged in recent times. The overarching goal of this article is to present a comprehensive perspective on the current state of fault diagnosis and fault-tolerant control within the context of robotic manipulators, positioning our exploration within the broader framework of AI, ML, and DTT advancements. Through a meticulous examination of both historical foundations and contemporary innovations, this review significantly contributes to the existing body of knowledge, offering valuable insights for researchers, practitioners, and enthusiasts navigating the dynamic landscape of robotic manipulator control.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 305 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2024.

Builds on

10 of 305 references.

References · 10

  1. 2022Context Autoencoder for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 297
  2. 2018An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRIcited by 140
  3. 2019Survey on Deep Neural Networks in Speech and Vision Systemscited by 37
  4. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning for the Control of Robotic Manipulation: A Focussed Mini-Reviewcited by 34
  5. 2021Explainable AI for Robot Failures: Generating Explanations that Improve User Assistance in Fault Recoverycited by 32
  6. 2021Latent Space Data Assimilation by using Deep Learningcited by 30
  7. 2021The Challenges and Opportunities of Human-Centered AI for Trustworthy Robots and Autonomous Systemscited by 8
  8. 2021Fault-tolerant Control of Robot Manipulators with Sensory Faults using Unbiased Active Inferencecited by 5
  9. 2015Distributed Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Control of Uncertain Multi-Agent Systemscited by 1
  10. 2023Sensor Fault Detection and Compensation with Performance Prescription for Robotic Manipulatorscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.