mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Describing Images textitFast and Slow: Quantifying and Predicting the Variation in Human Signals during Visuo-Linguistic Processes

arXiv 2402.01352 ↗First posted 2 Feb 2024cs.CL cs.AI cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There is an intricate relation between the properties of an image and how humans behave while describing the image. This behavior shows ample variation, as manifested in human signals such as eye movements and when humans start to describe the image. Despite the value of such signals of visuo-linguistic variation, they are virtually disregarded in the training of current pretrained models, which motivates further investigation. Using a corpus of Dutch image descriptions with concurrently collected eye-tracking data, we explore the nature of the variation in visuo-linguistic signals, and find that they correlate with each other. Given this result, we hypothesize that variation stems partly from the properties of the images, and explore whether image representations encoded by pretrained vision encoders can capture such variation. Our results indicate that pretrained models do so to a weak-to-moderate degree, suggesting that the models lack biases about what makes a stimulus complex for humans and what leads to variations in human outputs.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 92 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Feb 2024.

Builds on

27 of 92 references.

References · 27

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  4. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  5. 2021Multimodal Few-Shot Learning with Frozen Language Modelscited by 657
  6. 2021ClipCap: CLIP Prefix for Image Captioningcited by 557
  7. 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 452
  8. 2021How Much Can CLIP Benefit Vision-and-Language Tasks?cited by 321
  9. 2023WhisperX: Time-Accurate Speech Transcription of Long-Form Audiocited by 320
  10. 2021VisualGPT: Data-efficient Adaptation of Pretrained Language Models for Image Captioningcited by 190
  11. 2016Human Attention in Visual Question Answering: Do Humans and Deep Networks Look at the Same Regions?cited by 111
  12. 2022Why Does Surprisal From Larger Transformer-Based Language Models Provide a Poorer Fit to Human Reading Times?cited by 111
15 more
  1. 2019BERTje: A Dutch BERT Modelcited by 109
  2. 2023Towards Language Models That Can See: Computer Vision Through the LENS of Natural Languagecited by 53
  3. 2022MAPL: Parameter-Efficient Adaptation of Unimodal Pre-Trained Models for Vision-Language Few-Shot Promptingcited by 41
  4. 2023Transformer-Based Language Model Surprisal Predicts Human Reading Times Best with About Two Billion Training Tokenscited by 39
  5. 2022Syntactic Surprisal From Neural Models Predicts, But Underestimates, Human Processing Difficulty From Syntactic Ambiguitiescited by 30
  6. 2021Multilingual Language Models Predict Human Reading Behaviorcited by 29
  7. 2016Improving sentence compression by learning to predict gazecited by 24
  8. 2016Seeing with Humans: Gaze-Assisted Neural Image Captioningcited by 20
  9. 2020Generating Image Descriptions via Sequential Cross-Modal Alignment Guided by Human Gazecited by 16
  10. 2021VQA-MHUG: A Gaze Dataset to Study Multimodal Neural Attention in Visual Question Answeringcited by 16
  11. 2021CogAlign: Learning to Align Textual Neural Representations to Cognitive Language Processing Signalscited by 11
  12. 2021A Survey on Using Gaze Behaviour for Natural Language Processingcited by 11
  13. 2015Image Specificitycited by 4
  14. 2022GazBy: Gaze-Based BERT Model to Incorporate Human Attention in Neural Information Retrievalcited by 2
  15. 2023Cross-Lingual Transfer of Cognitive Processing Complexitycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.