mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Leveraging Human-Machine Interactions for Computer Vision Dataset Quality Enhancement

arXiv 2401.17736 ↗First posted 31 Jan 2024cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large-scale datasets for single-label multi-class classification, such as ImageNet-1k, have been instrumental in advancing deep learning and computer vision. However, a critical and often understudied aspect is the comprehensive quality assessment of these datasets, especially regarding potential multi-label annotation errors. In this paper, we introduce a lightweight, user-friendly, and scalable framework that synergizes human and machine intelligence for efficient dataset validation and quality enhancement. We term this novel framework Multilabelfy. Central to Multilabelfy is an adaptable web-based platform that systematically guides annotators through the re-evaluation process, effectively leveraging human-machine interactions to enhance dataset quality. By using Multilabelfy on the ImageNetV2 dataset, we found that approximately 47.88% of the images contained at least two labels, underscoring the need for more rigorous assessments of such influential datasets. Furthermore, our analysis showed a negative correlation between the number of potential labels per image and model top-1 accuracy, illuminating a crucial factor in model evaluation and selection. Our open-source framework, Multilabelfy, offers a convenient, lightweight solution for dataset enhancement, emphasizing multi-label proportions. This study tackles major challenges in dataset integrity and provides key insights into model performance evaluation. Moreover, it underscores the advantages of integrating human expertise with machine capabilities to produce more robust models and trustworthy data development. The source code for Multilabelfy will be available at https://github.com/esla/Multilabelfy. keywordsComputer Vision and Dataset Quality Enhancement and Dataset Validation and Human-Computer Interaction and Multi-label Annotation.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 13 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2024.

Builds on

10 of 13 references.

References · 10

  1. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  2. 2021Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarkscited by 388
  3. 2023EVA-02: A Visual Representation for Neon Genesiscited by 377
  4. 2020Are we done with ImageNet?cited by 329
  5. 2020From ImageNet to Image Classification: Contextualizing Progress on Benchmarkscited by 90
  6. 2022When does dough become a bagel? Analyzing the remaining mistakes on ImageNetcited by 60
  7. 2023Know Your Self-supervised Learning: A Survey on Image-based Generative and Discriminative Trainingcited by 39
  8. 2020Identifying Statistical Bias in Dataset Replicationcited by 24
  9. 2022Bugs in the Data: How ImageNet Misrepresents Biodiversitycited by 24
  10. 2022A Principled Evaluation Protocol for Comparative Investigation of the Effectiveness of DNN Classification Models on Similar-but-non-identical Datasetscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.