mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Characterization of Magnetic Labyrinthine Structures Through Junctions and Terminals Detection Using Template Matching and CNN

arXiv 2401.16688 ↗First posted 30 Jan 2024cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Defects influence diverse properties of materials, shaping their structural, mechanical, and electronic characteristics. Among a variety of materials exhibiting unique defects, magnets exhibit diverse nano- to micro-scale defects and have been intensively studied in materials science. Specifically, defects in magnetic labyrinthine patterns, called junctions and terminals are ubiquitous and serve as points of interest. While detecting and characterizing such defects is crucial for understanding magnets, systematically investigating large-scale images containing over a thousand closely packed junctions and terminals remains a formidable challenge. This study introduces a new technique called TM-CNN (Template Matching - Convolutional Neural Network) designed to detect a multitude of small objects in images, such as the defects in magnetic labyrinthine patterns. TM-CNN was used to identify 641,649 such structures in 444 experimental images, and the results were explored to deepen understanding of magnetic materials. It employs a two-stage detection approach combining template matching, used in initial detection, with a convolutional neural network, used to eliminate incorrect identifications. To train a CNN classifier, it is necessary to annotate a large number of training images. This difficulty prevents the use of CNN in many practical applications. TM-CNN significantly reduces the manual workload for creating training images by automatically making most of the annotations and leaving only a small number of corrections to human reviewers. In testing, TM-CNN achieved an impressive F1 score of 0.991, far outperforming traditional template matching and CNN-based object detection algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jan 2024.

Builds on

16 of 65 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  4. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  5. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
  6. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,277
  7. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,036
  8. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,852
  9. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,586
  10. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,422
  11. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,162
  12. 2019FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 1,577
4 more
  1. 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,319
  2. 2017Cascade R-CNN: Delving into High Quality Object Detectioncited by 1,276
  3. 2018CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypointscited by 763
  4. 2020Sparse R-CNN: End-to-End Object Detection with Learnable Proposalscited by 495

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.