mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Non-Fluent Synthetic Target-Language Data Improve Neural Machine Translation

arXiv 2401.16086 ↗First posted 29 Jan 2024cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When the amount of parallel sentences available to train a neural machine translation is scarce, a common practice is to generate new synthetic training samples from them. A number of approaches have been proposed to produce synthetic parallel sentences that are similar to those in the parallel data available. These approaches work under the assumption that non-fluent target-side synthetic training samples can be harmful and may deteriorate translation performance. Even so, in this paper we demonstrate that synthetic training samples with non-fluent target sentences can improve translation performance if they are used in a multilingual machine translation framework as if they were sentences in another language. We conducted experiments on ten low-resource and four high-resource translation tasks and found out that this simple approach consistently improves translation performance as compared to state-of-the-art methods for generating synthetic training samples similar to those found in corpora. Furthermore, this improvement is independent of the size of the original training corpus, the resulting systems are much more robust against domain shift and produce less hallucinations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 45 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2024.

Builds on

45 of 64 references.

References · 45

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  3. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
  4. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
  5. 2019fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modelingcited by 1,488
  6. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,312
  7. 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,033
  8. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 988
  9. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 788
  10. 2020Language-agnostic BERT Sentence Embeddingcited by 627
  11. 2015Generating Sentences from a Continuous Spacecited by 612
  12. 2016Google's Multilingual Neural Machine Translation System: Enabling Zero-Shot Translationcited by 469
33 more
  1. 2021A Survey of Data Augmentation Approaches for NLPcited by 409
  2. 2017Unsupervised Neural Machine Translationcited by 149
  3. 2017Data Augmentation for Low-Resource Neural Machine Translationcited by 139
  4. 2020On Exposure Bias, Hallucination and Domain Shift in Neural Machine Translationcited by 127
  5. 2018Analyzing Uncertainty in Neural Machine Translationcited by 126
  6. 2018Achieving Human Parity on Automatic Chinese to English News Translationcited by 119
  7. 2016Reward Augmented Maximum Likelihood for Neural Structured Predictioncited by 81
  8. 2017Data Noising as Smoothing in Neural Network Language Modelscited by 78
  9. 2019Tagged Back-Translationcited by 77
  10. 2016Edinburgh Neural Machine Translation Systems for WMT 16cited by 76
  11. 2018On the Impact of Various Types of Noise on Neural Machine Translationcited by 76
  12. 2022Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations in Machine Translation: Model Internal Workings Alone Do Well, Sentence Similarity Even Bettercited by 75
  13. 2018SwitchOut: an Efficient Data Augmentation Algorithm for Neural Machine Translationcited by 72
  14. 2020Analyzing the Source and Target Contributions to Predictions in Neural Machine Translationcited by 71
  15. 2020Sequence-Level Mixed Sample Data Augmentationcited by 71
  16. 2019Domain Robustness in Neural Machine Translationcited by 65
  17. 2022Looking for a Needle in a Haystack: A Comprehensive Study of Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translationcited by 61
  18. 2021Understanding the Properties of Minimum Bayes Risk Decoding in Neural Machine Translationcited by 56
  19. 2016A Convolutional Encoder Model for Neural Machine Translationcited by 54
  20. 2019Soft Contextual Data Augmentation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 49
  21. 2018Trivial Transfer Learning for Low-Resource Neural Machine Translationcited by 47
  22. 2023Understanding and Detecting Hallucinations in Neural Machine Translation via Model Introspectioncited by 44
  23. 2018Regularizing Neural Machine Translation by Target-bidirectional Agreementcited by 40
  24. 2016Linguistic Input Features Improve Neural Machine Translationcited by 38
  25. 2021Prevent the Language Model from being Overconfident in Neural Machine Translationcited by 34
  26. 2020Uncertainty-Aware Semantic Augmentation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 13
  27. 2022Optimal Transport for Unsupervised Hallucination Detection in Neural Machine Translationcited by 13
  28. 2021Attention Weights in Transformer NMT Fail Aligning Words Between Sequences but Largely Explain Model Predictionscited by 11
  29. 2020Token Drop mechanism for Neural Machine Translationcited by 8
  30. 2021Sentence Concatenation Approach to Data Augmentation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 8
  31. 2021Rethinking Data Augmentation for Low-Resource Neural Machine Translation: A Multi-Task Learning Approachcited by 8
  32. 2022AdMix: A Mixed Sample Data Augmentation Method for Neural Machine Translationcited by 4
  33. 2014Generalized Biwords for Bitext Compression and Translation Spottingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.