mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding the effects of word-level linguistic annotations in under-resourced neural machine translation

arXiv 2401.16078 ↗First posted 29 Jan 2024cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper studies the effects of word-level linguistic annotations in under-resourced neural machine translation, for which there is incomplete evidence in the literature. The study covers eight language pairs, different training corpus sizes, two architectures, and three types of annotation: dummy tags (with no linguistic information at all), part-of-speech tags, and morpho-syntactic description tags, which consist of part of speech and morphological features. These linguistic annotations are interleaved in the input or output streams as a single tag placed before each word. In order to measure the performance under each scenario, we use automatic evaluation metrics and perform automatic error classification. Our experiments show that, in general, source-language annotations are helpful and morpho-syntactic descriptions outperform part of speech for some language pairs. On the contrary, when words are annotated in the target language, part-of-speech tags systematically outperform morpho-syntactic description tags in terms of automatic evaluation metrics, even though the use of morpho-syntactic description tags improves the grammaticality of the output. We provide a detailed analysis of the reasons behind this result.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2024.

Builds on

18 of 34 references.

References · 18

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
  4. 2016Using the Output Embedding to Improve Language Modelscited by 266
  5. 2016Edinburgh Neural Machine Translation Systems for WMT 16cited by 76
  6. 2019Revisiting Low-Resource Neural Machine Translation: A Case Studycited by 61
  7. 2019Universal Dependency Parsing from Scratchcited by 46
  8. 2016Linguistic Input Features Improve Neural Machine Translationcited by 38
  9. 2018A Tree-based Decoder for Neural Machine Translationcited by 18
  10. 2017The University of Edinburgh's Neural MT Systems for WMT17cited by 16
  11. 2017Predicting Target Language CCG Supertags Improves Neural Machine Translationcited by 15
  12. 2019UDPipe at SIGMORPHON 2019: Contextualized Embeddings, Regularization with Morphological Categories, Corpora Mergingcited by 15
6 more
  1. 2017A Multifaceted Evaluation of Neural versus Phrase-Based Machine Translation for 9 Language Directionscited by 10
  2. 2017Modeling Target-Side Inflection in Neural Machine Translationcited by 9
  3. 2019Latent Part-of-Speech Sequences for Neural Machine Translationcited by 7
  4. 2018Top-down Tree Structured Decoding with Syntactic Connections for Neural Machine Translation and Parsingcited by 5
  5. 2017Chunk-Based Bi-Scale Decoder for Neural Machine Translationcited by 2
  6. 2019CMU-01 at the SIGMORPHON 2019 Shared Task on Crosslinguality and Context in Morphologycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.