mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Transparency Attacks: How Imperceptible Image Layers Can Fool AI Perception

arXiv 2401.15817 ↗First posted 29 Jan 2024cs.CV cs.CR cs.LGcited by 1

On the map: LLM safety and security → Backdoor and data poisoning attacks

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper investigates a novel algorithmic vulnerability when imperceptible image layers confound multiple vision models into arbitrary label assignments and captions. We explore image preprocessing methods to introduce stealth transparency, which triggers AI misinterpretation of what the human eye perceives. The research compiles a broad attack surface to investigate the consequences ranging from traditional watermarking, steganography, and background-foreground miscues. We demonstrate dataset poisoning using the attack to mislabel a collection of grayscale landscapes and logos using either a single attack layer or randomly selected poisoning classes. For example, a military tank to the human eye is a mislabeled bridge to object classifiers based on convolutional networks (YOLO, etc.) and vision transformers (ViT, GPT-Vision, etc.). A notable attack limitation stems from its dependency on the background (hidden) layer in grayscale as a rough match to the transparent foreground image that the human eye perceives. This dependency limits the practical success rate without manual tuning and exposes the hidden layers when placed on the opposite display theme (e.g., light background, light transparent foreground visible, works best against a light theme image viewer or browser). The stealth transparency confounds established vision systems, including evading facial recognition and surveillance, digital watermarking, content filtering, dataset curating, automotive and drone autonomy, forensic evidence tampering, and retail product misclassifying. This method stands in contrast to traditional adversarial attacks that typically focus on modifying pixel values in ways that are either slightly perceptible or entirely imperceptible for both humans and machines.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Backdoor and data poisoning attacks, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 14 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2024.

Builds on

14 of 28 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023CleanCLIP: Mitigating Data Poisoning Attacks in Multimodal Contrastive Learning6 Mar
  2. 2021Data Poisoning Won't Save You From Facial Recognition28 Jun
  3. 2021What Doesn't Kill You Makes You Robust(er): How to Adversarially Train against Data Poisoning26 Feb

Other references · 11

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2021On the Robustness of Vision Transformers to Adversarial Examplescited by 167
  3. 2021Advances in adversarial attacks and defenses in computer vision: A surveycited by 127
  4. 2020Just How Toxic is Data Poisoning? A Unified Benchmark for Backdoor and Data Poisoning Attackscited by 109
  5. 2021Towards Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Vision Transformerscited by 80
  6. 2023Enhancing CLIP with GPT-4: Harnessing Visual Descriptions as Promptscited by 48
  7. 2019A Survey of Black-Box Adversarial Attacks on Computer Vision Modelscited by 36
  8. 2021Evaluating Adversarial Attacks on Driving Safety in Vision-Based Autonomous Vehiclescited by 24
  9. 2020Systematic Evaluation of Backdoor Data Poisoning Attacks on Image Classifierscited by 23
  10. 2021Simple Transparent Adversarial Examplescited by 6
  11. 2020Jacks of All Trades, Masters Of None: Addressing Distributional Shift and Obtrusiveness via Transparent Patch Attackscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.