mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Study of Acquisition Functions for Medical Imaging Deep Active Learning

arXiv 2401.15721 ↗First posted 28 Jan 2024cs.CV cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Deep Learning revolution has enabled groundbreaking achievements in recent years. From breast cancer detection to protein folding, deep learning algorithms have been at the core of very important advancements. However, these modern advancements are becoming more and more data-hungry, especially on labeled data whose availability is scarce: this is even more prevalent in the medical context. In this work, we show how active learning could be very effective in data scarcity situations, where obtaining labeled data (or annotation budget is very limited). We compare several selection criteria (BALD, MeanSTD, and MaxEntropy) on the ISIC 2016 dataset. We also explored the effect of acquired pool size on the model's performance. Our results suggest that uncertainty is useful to the Melanoma detection task, and confirms the hypotheses of the author of the paper of interest, that textitbald performs on average better than other acquisition functions. Our extended analyses however revealed that all acquisition functions perform badly on the positive (cancerous) samples, suggesting exploitation of class unbalance, which could be crucial in real-world settings. We finish by suggesting future work directions that would be useful to improve this current work. The code of our implementation is open-sourced at urlhttps://github.com/bonaventuredossou/ece526courseproject

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jan 2024.

Builds on

12 of 26 references.

References · 12

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
  3. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
  4. 2017Deep Bayesian Active Learning with Image Datacited by 812
  5. 2017Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection: A Challenge at the 2017 International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 549
  6. 2015Bayesian SegNet: Model Uncertainty in Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architectures for Scene Understandingcited by 218
  7. 2022Biological Sequence Design with GFlowNetscited by 172
  8. 2015Bayesian Convolutional Neural Networks with Bernoulli Approximate Variational Inferencecited by 159
  9. 2017Deep Active Learning for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 108
  10. 2018Deep Bayesian Active Learning for Natural Language Processing: Results of a Large-Scale Empirical Studycited by 90
  11. 2022AfroLM: A Self-Active Learning-based Multilingual Pretrained Language Model for 23 African Languagescited by 46
  12. 2022Graph-Based Active Machine Learning Method for Diverse and Novel Antimicrobial Peptides Generation and Selectioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.