mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

How We Refute Claims: Automatic Fact-Checking through Flaw Identification and Explanation

arXiv 2401.15312 ↗First posted 27 Jan 2024cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automated fact-checking is a crucial task in the governance of internet content. Although various studies utilize advanced models to tackle this issue, a significant gap persists in addressing complex real-world rumors and deceptive claims. To address this challenge, this paper explores the novel task of flaw-oriented fact-checking, including aspect generation and flaw identification. We also introduce RefuteClaim, a new framework designed specifically for this task. Given the absence of an existing dataset, we present FlawCheck, a dataset created by extracting and transforming insights from expert reviews into relevant aspects and identified flaws. The experimental results underscore the efficacy of RefuteClaim, particularly in classifying and elucidating false claims.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jan 2024.

Builds on

7 of 11 references.

References · 7

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
  4. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,779
  5. 2023Fact-Checking Complex Claims with Program-Guided Reasoningcited by 146
  6. 2020Generating Fact Checking Explanationscited by 132
  7. 2022Generating Literal and Implied Subquestions to Fact-check Complex Claimscited by 66

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

7 papers.