Evaluation of LLM Chatbots for OSINT-based Cyber Threat Awareness
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Knowledge sharing about emerging threats is crucial in the rapidly advancing field of cybersecurity and forms the foundation of Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI). In this context, Large Language Models are becoming increasingly significant in the field of cybersecurity, presenting a wide range of opportunities. This study surveys the performance of ChatGPT, GPT4all, Dolly, Stanford Alpaca, Alpaca-LoRA, Falcon, and Vicuna chatbots in binary classification and Named Entity Recognition (NER) tasks performed using Open Source INTelligence (OSINT). We utilize well-established data collected in previous research from Twitter to assess the competitiveness of these chatbots when compared to specialized models trained for those tasks. In binary classification experiments, Chatbot GPT-4 as a commercial model achieved an acceptable F1 score of 0.94, and the open-source GPT4all model achieved an F1 score of 0.90. However, concerning cybersecurity entity recognition, all evaluated chatbots have limitations and are less effective. This study demonstrates the capability of chatbots for OSINT binary classification and shows that they require further improvement in NER to effectively replace specially trained models. Our results shed light on the limitations of the LLM chatbots when compared to specialized models, and can help researchers improve chatbots technology with the objective to reduce the required effort to integrate machine learning in OSINT-based CTI tools.
Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2024.
Builds on
36 of 70 references.
References · 36
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
- 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,673
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
- 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
- 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,127
- 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 870
- 2016Training Deep Nets with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 848
24 more
- 2019Fast Transformer Decoding: One Write-Head is All You Needcited by 717
- 2024DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermismcited by 642
- 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 488
- 2021Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-Trained Language Models: A Surveycited by 463
- 2023Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyondcited by 411
- 2021A Survey of Transformerscited by 401
- 2023How is ChatGPT's behavior changing over time?cited by 270
- 2022Is GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator?cited by 208
- 2023ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of nonecited by 204
- 2023From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacycited by 143
- 2020Deep Learning Based Text Classification: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 141
- 2023Representational Strengths and Limitations of Transformerscited by 133
- 2020A Survey on Text Classification: From Shallow to Deep Learningcited by 80
- 2023Have LLMs Advanced Enough? A Challenging Problem Solving Benchmark For Large Language Modelscited by 77
- 2023GPT-3.5, GPT-4, or BARD? Evaluating LLMs Reasoning Ability in Zero-Shot Setting and Performance Boosting Through Promptscited by 34
- 2023Evaluation of ChatGPT Model for Vulnerability Detectioncited by 33
- 2023Pushing the Limits of ChatGPT on NLP Taskscited by 27
- 2023How Generative AI models such as ChatGPT can be (Mis)Used in SPC Practice, Education, and Research? An Exploratory Studycited by 16
- 2019Processing Tweets for Cybersecurity Threat Awarenesscited by 10
- 2023Chatbots in a Honeypot Worldcited by 9
- 2023Chatbots to ChatGPT in a Cybersecurity Space: Evolution, Vulnerabilities, Attacks, Challenges, and Future Recommendationscited by 8
- 2023Are LLMs the Master of All Trades? : Exploring Domain-Agnostic Reasoning Skills of LLMscited by 7
- 2019Cyberthreat Detection from Twitter using Deep Neural Networkscited by 6
- 2021Global Interaction Modelling in Vision Transformer via Super Tokenscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.
14 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2024When LLMs Meet Cybersecurity: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 71
- 2024Building Trust in Mental Health Chatbots: Safety Metrics and LLM-Based Evaluation Toolscited by 9
- 2025Large Language Models for Security Operations Centers: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 9
- 2024Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models for Improving Digital Forensic Investigation Efficiencycited by 7
- 2024IntellBot: Retrieval Augmented LLM Chatbot for Cyber Threat Knowledge Deliverycited by 4
- 2025Evaluating the Quality of Randomness and Entropy in Tasks Supported by Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2024AttackER: Towards Enhancing Cyber-Attack Attribution with a Named Entity Recognition Datasetcited by 2
- 2024Evaluating the Usability of LLMs in Threat Intelligence Enrichmentcited by 2
- 2025False Alarms, Real Damage: Adversarial Attacks Using LLM-based Models on Text-based Cyber Threat Intelligence Systemscited by 2
- 2026CyberThreat-Eval: Can Large Language Models Automate Real-World Threat Research?cited by 2
- 2024Efficient Learning Content Retrieval with Knowledge Injectioncited by 0
- 2025Large Language Models for Explainable Threat Intelligencecited by 0
- 2026Agentic and Generative AI for Open-Source Intelligence and Cyber Investigations: Taxonomy, Evaluation, Challenges, and Future Directions3 Jul 2026
- 2026CyberThreat-Eval: Can Large Language Models Automate Real-World Threat Research?10 Mar 2026
- 2025Identification of Malicious Posts on the Dark Web Using Supervised Machine Learning28 Nov 2025
- 2025Large Language Models for Explainable Threat Intelligence7 Nov 2025
- 2025Evaluating the Quality of Randomness and Entropy in Tasks Supported by Large Language Models14 Oct 2025
- 2025Large Language Models for Security Operations Centers: A Comprehensive Survey13 Sep 2025
- 2025False Alarms, Real Damage: Adversarial Attacks Using LLM-based Models on Text-based Cyber Threat Intelligence Systems5 Jul 2025
- 2024Efficient Learning Content Retrieval with Knowledge Injection28 Nov 2024
- 2024IntellBot: Retrieval Augmented LLM Chatbot for Cyber Threat Knowledge Delivery8 Nov 2024
- 2024Evaluating the Usability of LLMs in Threat Intelligence Enrichment23 Sep 2024
- 2024AttackER: Towards Enhancing Cyber-Attack Attribution with a Named Entity Recognition Dataset9 Aug 2024
- 2024Building Trust in Mental Health Chatbots: Safety Metrics and LLM-Based Evaluation Tools3 Aug 2024
- 2024When LLMs Meet Cybersecurity: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 71
- 2025Large Language Models for Security Operations Centers: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 9
- 2024Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models for Improving Digital Forensic Investigation Efficiencycited by 7
- 2025Evaluating the Quality of Randomness and Entropy in Tasks Supported by Large Language Modelscited by 3
- 2024AttackER: Towards Enhancing Cyber-Attack Attribution with a Named Entity Recognition Datasetcited by 2
- 2024Evaluating the Usability of LLMs in Threat Intelligence Enrichmentcited by 2
- 2025False Alarms, Real Damage: Adversarial Attacks Using LLM-based Models on Text-based Cyber Threat Intelligence Systemscited by 2
- 2026CyberThreat-Eval: Can Large Language Models Automate Real-World Threat Research?cited by 2
- 2025Identification of Malicious Posts on the Dark Web Using Supervised Machine Learningcited by 0
- 2026CyberThreat-Eval: Can Large Language Models Automate Real-World Threat Research?10 Mar 2026
- 2025Identification of Malicious Posts on the Dark Web Using Supervised Machine Learning28 Nov 2025
- 2025Evaluating the Quality of Randomness and Entropy in Tasks Supported by Large Language Models14 Oct 2025
- 2025Large Language Models for Security Operations Centers: A Comprehensive Survey13 Sep 2025
- 2025False Alarms, Real Damage: Adversarial Attacks Using LLM-based Models on Text-based Cyber Threat Intelligence Systems5 Jul 2025
- 2024Evaluating the Usability of LLMs in Threat Intelligence Enrichment23 Sep 2024
- 2024AttackER: Towards Enhancing Cyber-Attack Attribution with a Named Entity Recognition Dataset9 Aug 2024
- 2024When LLMs Meet Cybersecurity: A Systematic Literature Review6 May 2024
- 2024Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models for Improving Digital Forensic Investigation Efficiency29 Feb 2024