mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluation of LLM Chatbots for OSINT-based Cyber Threat Awareness

arXiv 2401.15127 ↗First posted 26 Jan 2024cs.CR cs.CL cs.LGcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Knowledge sharing about emerging threats is crucial in the rapidly advancing field of cybersecurity and forms the foundation of Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI). In this context, Large Language Models are becoming increasingly significant in the field of cybersecurity, presenting a wide range of opportunities. This study surveys the performance of ChatGPT, GPT4all, Dolly, Stanford Alpaca, Alpaca-LoRA, Falcon, and Vicuna chatbots in binary classification and Named Entity Recognition (NER) tasks performed using Open Source INTelligence (OSINT). We utilize well-established data collected in previous research from Twitter to assess the competitiveness of these chatbots when compared to specialized models trained for those tasks. In binary classification experiments, Chatbot GPT-4 as a commercial model achieved an acceptable F1 score of 0.94, and the open-source GPT4all model achieved an F1 score of 0.90. However, concerning cybersecurity entity recognition, all evaluated chatbots have limitations and are less effective. This study demonstrates the capability of chatbots for OSINT binary classification and shows that they require further improvement in NER to effectively replace specially trained models. Our results shed light on the limitations of the LLM chatbots when compared to specialized models, and can help researchers improve chatbots technology with the objective to reduce the required effort to integrate machine learning in OSINT-based CTI tools.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jan 2024.

Builds on

36 of 70 references.

References · 36

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 14,132
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  5. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,374
  6. 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,673
  7. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 3,019
  8. 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,724
  9. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
  10. 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,127
  11. 2023ChatGPT Outperforms Crowd-Workers for Text-Annotation Taskscited by 870
  12. 2016Training Deep Nets with Sublinear Memory Costcited by 848
24 more
  1. 2019Fast Transformer Decoding: One Write-Head is All You Needcited by 717
  2. 2024DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermismcited by 642
  3. 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 488
  4. 2021Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing via Large Pre-Trained Language Models: A Surveycited by 463
  5. 2023Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyondcited by 411
  6. 2021A Survey of Transformerscited by 401
  7. 2023How is ChatGPT's behavior changing over time?cited by 270
  8. 2022Is GPT-3 a Good Data Annotator?cited by 208
  9. 2023ChatGPT: Jack of all trades, master of nonecited by 204
  10. 2023From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacycited by 143
  11. 2020Deep Learning Based Text Classification: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 141
  12. 2023Representational Strengths and Limitations of Transformerscited by 133
  13. 2020A Survey on Text Classification: From Shallow to Deep Learningcited by 80
  14. 2023Have LLMs Advanced Enough? A Challenging Problem Solving Benchmark For Large Language Modelscited by 77
  15. 2023GPT-3.5, GPT-4, or BARD? Evaluating LLMs Reasoning Ability in Zero-Shot Setting and Performance Boosting Through Promptscited by 34
  16. 2023Evaluation of ChatGPT Model for Vulnerability Detectioncited by 33
  17. 2023Pushing the Limits of ChatGPT on NLP Taskscited by 27
  18. 2023How Generative AI models such as ChatGPT can be (Mis)Used in SPC Practice, Education, and Research? An Exploratory Studycited by 16
  19. 2019Processing Tweets for Cybersecurity Threat Awarenesscited by 10
  20. 2023Chatbots in a Honeypot Worldcited by 9
  21. 2023Chatbots to ChatGPT in a Cybersecurity Space: Evolution, Vulnerabilities, Attacks, Challenges, and Future Recommendationscited by 8
  22. 2023Are LLMs the Master of All Trades? : Exploring Domain-Agnostic Reasoning Skills of LLMscited by 7
  23. 2019Cyberthreat Detection from Twitter using Deep Neural Networkscited by 6
  24. 2021Global Interaction Modelling in Vision Transformer via Super Tokenscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 7; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: